How Thinking Slowly Now Can Help You Make Better, Quicker Decisions In The Future

Reading Time

The factors that influence our decision making and the 2 systems of our thinking.


Without even knowing, our nutritional choices are being influenced by external factors in our environment. We may believe we are in control of our choices and our actions in regards to food selections and purposes. This is true in a sense. Our brain is in control, however what we may not be sure of is which System of thinking in our brain is working. The purpose of this article is to help you slow down your thinking and train your brain to make quick and automatic decisions that are aligned with your goals.

Here are a few factors that influence our nutritional choices and behaviour:

  • Foods away from home tend to have more Calories, fat, sugar and salt and less fruits, veg, fibre.

  • Sensory elements such as lighting and sound (ambience), even the waiters personality can influence what and how much we eat at a restaurant.

  • Price is a huge factor. Price alone can have a greater impact over a health message.

  • When we’re given a large portion, we tend to eat a large portion. 

  • Making foods more accessible leads to increased consumption/purchase and inversely making the less accessible reduces consumption/purchase. 

  • In most stores the ratio of highly processed foods exceeds the volume of foods like fruits and vegetables.

  • Even just the sight of a highly preferred food increases our desire to eat [3]


It is quite important to note that most people don’t recognise the environmental factors that influence their decisions or deny being subject to influence by these contextual cues. 

Our brains are amazing organs. They are small in comparison to our body but control everything that we do. Every thought, movement, action, memory. Our brains are in control of us, but what is in control of our brain?


In this article we will be discussing the 2 systems of thinking of our brain and the factors that influence our decision making when it comes to nutrition.

Key words:

Contextual influences: factors that influence our decisions

Heuristic: to find or discover, problem solving, self discovery

There are believed to be 2 systems in the brain:

System 1 is the brain’s fast, automatic, intuitive approach. System 1 is fast, automatic, frequent, emotional, stereotypic, unconscious.

System 2 is the mind’s slower, analytical mode, where reason dominates. System 2 is slow, effortful, infrequent, logical, calculating, conscious.

Systems of Thinking


By building skills through System 2, they can then become System 1 skills (more automatic).


Think about maths, simple addition or subtraction. You can automatically answer 2 + 2 = 4 or 7 x 3 = 21. At one point in time it was a lot more difficult, requiring more time and effort through System 2, but now it’s a System 1 task. 

In nutrition, it might’ve taken a while to look at a food and say whether it was a Protein, Carb or Fat. Now you know Chicken = Protein, Bread = Carb, Avo = Fat. Once System 2, now System 1.


We can develop the System 1 skill by training System 2 thinking.

Basically how we can improve our nutritional knowledge and understanding to make informed decisions. 


What is affecting our informed level of nutritional knowledge. 

You might follow some great evidence based people on Instagram like Layne Norton, Martin MacDonald, RP Strength, Mackenzie Baker, and James Smith. Plus you’re huge FNC fans.

However there is still some gurus out there that add some biases into the brain that make you doubt some things or add confusion to the mix. 


Not only that, everywhere you go, you’re processing information from your environment. Not only the people that you follow, the things on your newsfeed, the people you spend your time with - but nearly everywhere you go there is one or more of our senses being stimulated and informed about food. 

There is research that suggests that our dietary behaviours are in large the consequence of our automatic responses to contextual food cues, many of which lead to increased Caloric consumption and poor dietary choices. [1] It also states that our brains have a limited capacity to recognise, ignore and resist the cues that influence our eating. Further confirming that humans have a finite amount of energy and willpower. There is only so much temptation we can endure before we give in. 


When we look at restaurants and grocery stores, their primary role is for people to purchase food items. They are designed strategically to maximise sales. Research has been done on the location, labelling, pricing and pairing of items that influence us to buy certain foods. These foods generally aren’t the ones that fit into our “Protein and Plants” or goal aligned categories. 


As we don’t have control over our senses (such as sight, smell, sound), we also don’t have control over the ways these senses are influenced through our environment in settings where food is available. We don’t even realise how the factors influence our food choices. 


There is a growing body of research suggests that people respond to contextual cues without conscious thought or decision-making. This is our System 1 thinking taking over. Fast, automatic, instinctual, without conscious thought. 


A study actually measured how quickly consumers can make a decision to choose a preferred snack food [2]. After ranking their favourites out of 50, they were presented with a series of random images of two of the snacks lasting 20 milliseconds and were able to choose their preferred food item in over 70% of trials at average speeds of 404 ms.


In more natural settings we tend to make decisions about food very quickly without weighing up options or consequences.  When people make rapid decisions they rely on heuristic devices, such as the appearance of objects, familiar pictures, shapes, sizes, logos, brands and prices. 


When we rely on this heuristic cues we tend to make larger, more Calorie dense choices that contain more sugar and/or fat. Food cues such as marketing or labelling also often tend to mislead and confuse people into making a decision by suggesting a food is more appealing or even more “healthy” than is really is. Think “protein” products, low carb/low fat items or our health halo foods.


When we make decisions surrounding food we often weigh up things like: price, sensory appeal (taste, texture, smell, sight), convenience, familiarity and even whether it is goal aligned.  

This is all well and good if we actually took the time to do this by using our System 2 thinking process. However we often stick to the speedier System 1 version that requires the minimum amount of effort. 


We previously mentioned that we have a finite amount of energy, willpower and self control. 


Behavioural studies have been done and suggest that self control can fatigue just like a muscle. Self control can also be depleted by tasks that don’t require self control such as making decisions or doing cognitive tasks. 


A study was done where participants who had to memorise a 7-digit number were 50% more likely to choose chocolate cake over fruit salad compared to participants who had to memorise a 2-digit number [4]. Imagine how much information your brain needs to process each day before it even thinks about food. Then throw in a tempting environment or a choice between ice cream or yogurt and you can see why it gets harder as the day or week goes on. 


Hence why building healthy habits and making informed decisions are further endorsed by us at FNC. 


When people are overwhelmed with too much information, they often resort to their more automatic behaviours. If your automatic behaviours (habits) aren’t goal aligned, this can cause an issue. 

Cognitive depletion is considered a prime reason why dieters fail to maintain their diets and weight loss over the long term. [5,6] This means the more we are required to think during a given period of time, the less energy/willpower we will have and the more important it is to have a solid foundation of nutritional habits. Ideally we don’t want to take on  more than our brain is actually capable of especially when trying to build new and positive behaviours for our health and fitness goals.

Hence why we promote a step by step approach at FNC. 


How do we do this?

In the initial phases of building habits, take your time. Use your System 2 thinking process.

This requires you to be careful, intentional. Weigh-up your options, make comparisons, read labels, look at the benefits or consequences of certain choices. 


Build up your knowledge and confidence in making choices that are aligned with your goals before relying on your System 1. Train your brain to make good, positive, goal aligned choices automatically just like you trained it to do quick math and label foods into their macronutrient category. 

When you’re confident that your goal aligned choices are automatic, put your new System 1 thinking skills to the test.

If you’d like to improve your knowledge of nutrition to help make informed and automatic decision that are aligned with your goals, contact us today to start working with a coach or sign up to our education programs.

[1] https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3667220/

[2] https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1998456

[3] https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0195666384800082

[4] https://academic.oup.com/jcr/article-abstract/26/3/278/1815363

[5] https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18444745

[6] https://guilfordjournals.com/doi/abs/10.1521/soco.2000.18.2.130

6 Simple Steps to a Healthy Life rather than “Netflix Nutrition”

Reading Time

This blog is not medical advice and should not be used for that purpose.


6 Simple Steps to a Healthy Life:

  1. Don’t smoke

  2. Don’t drink alcohol excessively

  3. Exercise

  4. Eat fruit and vegetables daily

  5. Choose a way of eating that you enjoy and which helps you reach and maintain a healthy body weight

  6. Don’t focus all of your time and energy on one particular food

An individual’s dietary pattern may be more relevant than a direct effect from a single component (1). This is taken from the Australian Dietary Guidelines and it’s a perfect place to start. Health is more than one particular food, it is all of your lifestyle factors and choices combined. 

Much of the talk around meat vs plants comes from observational, population level nutrition studies. 

Observational studies can give associations and correlations but not causation. For example, an observational study may question a large group of people about their dietary habits over the past decade. Some correlations may then be able to be formed, such as those who drink soft drink are more likely to be scared of spiders (I made this up, but there are some really funny correlations if you check out this site https://www.tylervigen.com/spurious-correlations).


Correlations are great for directing further, more controlled study to try and prove or disprove causation - the reason things happen. 

When taking these observational studies and looking at meat eaters versus non-meat eaters, the vegetarian and vegan populations regularly fare better in terms of correlations towards health outcomes, specifically mortality (2). The obvious counter-arguments for this are that overall, non-meat eaters may be more health-seeking, more health conscious people. They tend to smoke less, drink less (3), exercise more and eat more fiber (4).

So what happens when health seeking meat eaters, who are conscious of smoking, alcohol consumption and exercise, are compared to vegetarians and vegans?

Turns out there doesn’t appear to be any difference between health seeking meat eaters and health seeking vegetarians, vegans, pescatarians or once per week meat eaters - “semi-vegetarians” (5).  


In the 1970s in the UK, about 11000 people were recruited from health shops or other avenues such as health food societies to participate in a long term observational study . 11000 health conscious, health seeking individuals. Less than half were vegetarians/vegans and they were studied for until death, or for up to 17 years if they survived the length of the study. There were initial questionnaires and follow up interviews and questionnaires. 

When the results were analysed there was no difference in mortality rates between those who ate meat and those who didn’t. The group as a whole had much lower mortality rates compared to the general population and this was linked to a lower amount of smokers in the group studied. The most significant observation from this study was that daily fresh fruit consumption correlated well to a reduced risk of mortality from disease (6). (Again, correlation not causation, but another little point to keep up your sleeve for the next fruit-fearing, fructose warrior who gets up in your grill for eating an apple).


Between 2006-2008 in NSW, Australia, nearly one quarter of a million people, aged 45 and up, took part in a dietary survey and six year follow up. This observational study also looked at dietary choices and mortality rates and found no differences between regular meat eaters and non-meat eaters. Researchers concluded that they found no correlations between vegetarian, pescatarian or semi-vegetarian and improved mortality rate. However, when compared to the general population, they did state that those who completed the survey were less likely to be smokers, more physically active and less likely to be overweight and obese (5).


These are just two observational studies, but there are many others which also conclude that when lifestyle factors (smoking, alcohol, exercise, fruit and vegetable intake) are accounted for, there does not appear to be a clear correlation between excluding meat from the diet and mortality from disease (7)(8)(9).


One more point which is important to define when talking about observational research and nutrition is relative risk versus absolute risk. These terms are not usually defined when trying to make a particular food sound scary - 

”Each 50g portion of processed meat eaten daily increases the risk of colorectal cancer by 18%” (10). This is relative risk, a comparative risk. Your chance of colorectal cancer is estimated to rise by 18% compared to the same person who doesn’t eat that 50 grams of processed meat each day.

Absolute risk is your chances of getting a disease over a period of time - this is the one which should be reported because it is more fair and less sexy - exactly the reasons it doesn’t get included in articles and “mock-umentaries”.


Looking specifically at colorectal cancer. Your absolute risk of getting colorectal cancer as a human at age 50 is 1.8% (11). 

Taking the above relative risk increase, if you eat 50 grams of processed meat each day you increase your relative risk by 18%. To apply this to your absolute risk you multiply your absolute risk by 1.18. 

0.018 x 1.18 = 0.021

So by eating 50 grams of processed meat each day of your life, you’ve taken your absolute risk of developing colorectal cancer from 1.8% to 2.1%. Not sexy, not headline grabbing, not worth using on Netflix or a clean eating blog. 

If you want a summary of the research around nutrition, taking into account the strengths and weaknesses of studies and claims, in all honesty the Australian Dietary Guidelines is a great place to start. It is inclusive of all foods and rates the claims for and against particular foods against a scale of research strength. Before reading blogs about restricting any particular foods or before watching any more Netflix-Nutrition, take some time to read the Australian Dietary Guidelines to give you some context around what you may hear.

 Furthermore, if you’d like more education on nutrition and how to find a way of eating that suits you and helps you life a healthy, enjoyable life; contact us today.

5 Competition Day Nutrition Tips

Reading Time

There are a few key principals that you want to have in place on the day of a sporting competition. Here are 5 Competition Day Nutrition Tips:

  1. Hydration

  2. Fuel availability (carbohydrates)

  3. Promotion of a net positive protein balance

  4. Caffeine (optional, but a good idea)

  5. Consideration for gastrointestinal comfort.

The effects of discomfort, namely gastrointestinal discomfort, is a component of competition day nutrition that should get upmost attention. Regardless of any proposed positive physiological benefit of something, if it makes you 'feel bad' or sick it's probably going to do more worse than good.

'Fuelling', or comp day 'protocols' should be tested, evaluated, and refined during training in the lead up to an event.

Competition day is NOT the time to try new foods, or even the same foods in greater amounts.

Selections should be based upon things that you know 'sit well with you' even in the amounts you intend to consume on the day.

For example, Pre-workouts and energy drinks often bloat many folks. So No-Doz is a safe bet when it comes to comfortable caffeine ingestion and don't go consuming 4 bagels when you normally would only ever consume 1 in a given sitting.

The principals would largely remain the same for an endurance event, but the selections would differ a little. Things like energy gels would come into the mix.

If you’re interested in performance nutrition coaching for your chosen sport, contact us today to start working with a sports nutritionist.

5 COMPETITION NUTRITION TIPS

Conquering Procrastination: How To Value Future You Over Present you

Reading Time

“Discipline equals Freedom”

“How you do one thing is how you do anything”

These are 2 quotes that are often used as motivators in helping us become the people we desire to be. 


We’ve previously discussed our believe that it isn’t necessary “discipline” that is what is required forever, rather our habits. With that said, some discipline is required in the initial phases of habit building. Today, we are going to discuss how some acts of discipline in various areas of your life can help you build character and confidence into other areas of your life. 

We can then say “Conquering one thing can help you muster the confidence to conquer another”.

Especially when it comes to procrastination

Many of us a serial procrastinators. 

Procrastination is the action of delaying or postponing something.


We usually think of this in a work or study sense but how often do we procrastinate with our health and fitness? Putting something off like cooking, prepping, shopping, training, journalling, even waking up.

So why do we procrastinate? 

One reason is that when we are faced with an uncomfortable task, our mind generates a negative emotion or tension build up. We want to achieve or maintain a level of comfort, so we put off a task. But the truth is, the task is going to cause the same tension when it comes along later on. We just delay the inevitable and sometimes add more pressure to the situation by adding a time constraint.

When you think about it, the criteria of the task remains constant. We are going to have to cook our meals eventually. We are going to have to wake up eventually. We are going to have to do that report eventually. It sounds bizarre that we would intensify the situation by reducing the time variable on that. If you’ve ever had to do your grocery shopping on a Sunday night, you almost immediately regret your decision to put it off and not get it done earlier on. 

Another is that we tend to care too much about our present selves and not about our future selves. Most of us know what things we “should” be doing like: saving money, eating protein and plants, sleeping 7-9 hours, meal prepping, studying. 

So why don’t we do it even when we know something is good for us?

We’d rather enjoy the immediate benefits of the present especially if the costs or consequences don’t show up until the distant future. We also search for instant gratification rather than delayed gratification.

Eg. Ordering uber eats and watching netflix has an immediate reward but the delayed cost of skipping the gym and a higher calorie meal won’t show up until a few months later when you don’t quite have the lean and healthy body you’re after.

Spending money on a new pair of jeans and shoes you don’t really need has an immediate rewards but a delayed cost when you don’t have enough money to go on that holiday you were hoping to have saved for.

We tend to over value the immediate benefits of unproductive behaviours such as scrolling social media, snoozing our alarms, uber eats, drive through take-away, taking the escalator.


What we can do is start to consider our future self and consider how our choices impact our distant future. In 6 months time would you rather be lean and healthy OR out of shape and out of netflix shows to watch? Would you rather be on a holiday or have 5 pairs of jeans you’ve worn once?

Future You knows you should do things that lead to the highest benefit in the long-term, but Present You tends to overvalue things that lead to immediate benefit right now.


Ideally we want to get our present self to act in the best interest of our future self.

We can do this in 3 ways.

Make the rewards of long-term behavior more immediate.

Make the costs of procrastination more immediate.

Remove procrastination triggers from your environment.

1. Make the rewards of long-term behaviour more immediate. 

Our mind wants an immediate benefit, a reward. How do we bring forward our long term benefits even when they’ll take a while to achieve. Visualisation. Imagine the benefits of your future self. Imagine how you’ll look and feel in 6 months time if you prepare your own meals consistently, sleep 7-9 hours a night, train regularly, walk a bit more. OR give yourself a visual reward like in the chain method Jerry Seinfeld used to practice by ticking off a day on the calendar whenever you complete a desired behaviour.

2. Make the costs of procrastination more immediate.

Create an immediate consequence for your procrastination. When we are only accountable to ourselves, the consequences are only applied to our future self. Skipping the gym, snoozing, getting takeaway, not studying, etc. They consequences only show up in 6 months time when you don’t quite have the lean and healthy body you’re after. When you aren’t as prepared for the exam as you thought. You could either get an accountability partner so you are immediately letting someone else down if you don’t practice certain behaviours. OR you can give yourself a light hearted punishment. Miss a workout, that’s 3 less beers you can have on the weekend. Don’t make the bed, that’s 50 burpees. Snooze your alarm, eat your most hated foods (more on that one later). I even once heard of an athlete who had to pay his coach $100 for not doing a daily check in. Hmmm, I might keep that one in mind. 

3. Remove procrastination triggers from your environment. 

Yup, we’ve said it again. It’s your environment. One of the best ways to value your future self is to remove procrastination triggers, to remove the temptation. Don’t give your present self an option that doesn’t favour your future self. Remove distraction. If you don’t want to snooze anymore, then put your phone/alarm in another room or out of arm’s reach. If you don’t want to face the temptation of indulgence items, don’t buy them or bring them in the house. If you want to prepare your own meals and not order uber eats, delete the app. Become a choice architect!


Every day we have a choice, actually hundreds of choices, to either give in to instant gratification for our present self OR commit to our future selves and seek delayed gratification.

This is not to say never satisfy your present self, just in the scorecard let is show that your future self is winning most of the time.

Whenever faced with a difficult choice or a battle between the present and future selves; 

ask yourself:

How will I feel about this choice in an hour?

How will I feel about this choice in a day?

How will I feel about this choice in a month?

How will I feel about this choice in 6 months?

Things to things about: 

  • The Pain is in the Anticipation. Things are never as painful as they seem. We delay doing things because they make us feel uncomfortable. Instead of dwelling on doing something and letting the tension build up, just do it. Rip it off like a bandaid. Once we’ve overcome the start, the pain dissipates and we then realise it was never as bad as we thought. 

*Personal experience. Josh has put off doing the cold shower thing for years. Finally decided to give it a crack, and it really wasn’t as bad as the story he told himself in his head.

  • There is no perfect time and you will not feel more like doing it tomorrow. Get started or do the thing sooner rather than later. Once started, let the good times roll and the benefits build up for your future self.

  • Getting started is magic. Not only does it relieve the pain built up in the anticipation, it changes your perception of the task and of yourself. You become more confident, motivated and optimistic. You did this, so you can easily do the next thing. Confidence breeds confidence.

  • Focus on the next step, not the next 100 steps. Break the goal into smaller achievable tasks.

  • Try the 2 minute rule. If it takes less than 2 minutes to do, do it straight away. 

  • Try the other 2 minute rule. Do something for 2 minutes. Walking, cooking, exercising, reading, meditating. Once you’ve started you’ll probably do it for longer than 2 minutes anyway. Just commit to 2 minutes to start. 

  • Talk to yourself. Tell yourself the story in simple terms. If you want to meal prep: “I’m just going to cook some chicken in the oven and fry up some vegetables, easy. If you want to go to the gym: “I’m just going to go to the gym on the way home from work and do the class workout”. If you want to read: “I’m just going to read my book after I have my morning shower”. 

  • List your obstacles and work out a strategy to overcome them.

This self control thing. This avoiding procrastination and valuing your future self over your present self is like a muscle. The more you do it, the stronger it gets. The easier it will then become. Then “How you do one thing is how you do anything” 


And what is the one thing most of us can do to start our day valuing our future self over our present self? 


Stop Snoozing!!! 

Last year, we kind of created No Snooze November. (only to find out that is was also somewhere else in the insta hashtags, but we will still claim it). 

How does No Snooze November work?

Simple. You commit to not press the snooze button on your alarm for the month of November. 

As mentioned above we are going to make the consequences of procrastination more immediate. 

If you do press the snooze alarm, you’ll have to eat “insert least favourite food” here. 

Josh’s is peas (close to pea-phobic). So if he pressed the snooze alarm, he will eat a bowl of peas. 

If you don’t have any food you cannot bear the thought of eating, pick an activity that you absolutely dream and make that your consequence. Cold shower, half marathon, 50 burpees, signing up for 1 on 1 nutrition coaching. Whatever it is, that’s your thing. 

You may find after a month, you’ll continue the habit and just get up first go. Win the morning win the day and start your day with the confidence to value your future self over your present self.



To learn how to make choices for your future self that help you become the person you want to be, contact us today for 1 on 1 nutrition coaching.




Nutrition for Strength and Power Sports

Reading Time

To preface this as a 'sort of disclaimer', it's assumed basic considerations like sleep, sufficient protein, stress management, plant intake and the overall healthfulness of the diet are already in place.

With most strength and power sports, relative strength and power to weight ratio is an important consideration to success. Even in sports like powerlifting where there is truth behind the idea of 'weight moves weight', weight class considerations and 'simply not just being heavy & strong' are important. So you want to be 'jacked and lean', & not just jacked if you want to be your/ the best.

With that in mind, power to weight ratio is largely predicated on accruing muscle mass gains and minimising body fat gain whilst practicing the skill of the specific sport. As a result, you'll find that during training phases or 'the off-season', strength & power athletes train more like bodybuilders seeking more muscle with nutrition to support this. For example in the off-season powerlifters and sprinters will dedicate a large portion of their training toward doing high volume resistance training to put on muscle mass. As training performance, optimises training stimulus, which drives adaptations to training (muscle growth), optimising sports (training) performance matters to bodybuilders just as it does to strength athletes.
So considering the aforementioned, most of the same nutrition 'stuff' that applies to bodybuilders trying to put on muscle without getting overly fat also applies to strength athletes. Without going into much more depth mutual considerations include.

  1. Sufficient energy availability - slight Calorie surplus to promote anabolism (growing)

  2. Sufficient protein - to support training adaptations.

  3. Protein timing - to promote positive protein turnover across the day.

  4. Glucose/carbohydrate availability to optimise training performance.

  5. Hydration for training performance & recovery.

  6. Caffeine for training performance.

  7. Micronutrients (vitamins and minerals) adequacy for recovery, performance, and adaptations.

  8. Gastrointestinal comfort - training performance.

  9. Structured dedicated periods of Calorie surplus to gain muscle, and periods of Calorie deficit to drop body fat. Both with the goal of maximising power to weight ratio over time.

The point where things start to differ is when the activities performed begin to lean more towards 'doing the actual sport' and getting the benefits from building the muscle in the offseason through having moire muscle mass to handle more load, and 'be more powerful'.

Bodybuilding style training is lower in intensity, (further away from the maximal single effort), and longer in duration (more reps at one time) compared to the action of a single max 'all-in' effort. Due to this, bodybuilding style training is more glycolytic meaning it relies more heavily on glucose availability to fuel muscle contractions. Whereas a single max effort is more reliant on available ATP and creatine phosphate stores. So with that in mind, point number 4 'Glucose/carbohydrate availability' could arguably, in theory, be dropped from the aforementioned list as glucose/carbohydrate availability isn't as relevant as a direct fuel for strength & power sports.

However, while glucose 'isn't the primary fuel' for 'a 10-second sprint', or a '1-rep-max deadlift', having glucose around is a great idea and being in a state of 'low blood sugar' certainly isn't. Glucose fuels the brain which is important for central nervous system activation and therefore the ability to contract muscle fibre's. Even for the reason of 'how you feel' being so impactful on your ability to perform, the notion of avoiding 'low blood sugar', and the fact that carbs won't hinder performance adds more reason to ensure glucose is present come competition day.

As mentioned before high-intensity max efforts heavily involve the PCr energy system. Which is largely predicated on creatine available. Creatine supplementation is needed to maximise creatine storage, with creatine monohydrate being the preferred form. It's got robust evidence to support it's use, its cheap and convenient. Don't bother with any other form of creatine. Monohydrate ticks the boxes. 3-5 grams per day, taken at any time for several weeks will cover you off.

To conclude, training for strength is largely about maximising muscle and limiting body fat to promote a better power to weight ratio. This is achieved largely by training and nutrition protocols not overly dissimilar to that of a bodybuilder, which includes separate phases of gaining muscle and losing body fat whilst doing everything possible to maintain sports abilities.

When the volume of work drops and intensity increases towards single maximal efforts closer to a competition, the provision of adequate fuelling still applies even if there is a lower reliance on glucose.

Make sure you're hydrated, sprinkle some caffeine on top, continue to supplement with creatine monohydrate, make sure you don't eat/drink anything that will upset your guts, and you're good to go.


To learn more about sports specific nutrition by working with a sports nutritionist, contact us today so we can help you become the best athlete you can be in your chosen sport.



General nutrition for sports performance blog post linked below.
https://www.fortitudenutritioncoaching.com.au/blog/fuellingforexercise101

Protein Requirements for Vegans

Reading Time

DO VEGANS NEED TO EAT MORE PROTEIN?

There is a rather strong rational argument that those who don't consume animal-based foods require more protein to be within optimal protein intake ranges especially if the goal is to maximise muscle growth or maximise muscle retention efforts during a fat loss phase.

What is this rational, why is this the case?

Plant-based proteins are slightly 'lower in quality' than their animal-based counterparts. What is referred to here is the amino acid composition of the different protein-containing foods, and whether they're a 'complete protein' containing all 9 essential amino acids (EAA's).

A complete protein is made up of 20 amino acids. 9 of them are essential (EAA's) meaning the body 'can't make them from other stuff', so we must get them through diet. While animal-based protein-containing foods contain all 9 EAA's, plant-based protein-containing foods often lack in 1 or more of the 9 EAA's. So in this sense plant proteins are 'less powerful', or 'less effective' for muscle growth or retention.

However, this isn't really an issue and rather just a slight inconvenience that is easily solved with slightly higher protein intakes and a wider variation of food sources to ensure all EAA's are present within the diet at sufficient amounts, and to 'make up for the lower quality'.

The main 'inconvenience' present is that many protein-containing plant foods come with 'extra baggage' in the form of additional carbohydrates and fats in high amounts. While almost all protein-containing foods come with carbohydrates or fats as well, and it's rare to find a food that is 1 macronutrient in isolation. The relative amounts, or 'protein to carb & fats ratio' is often less favorable for those trying to hit a 'higher protein' intake whilst keeping total Calorie intake within a ceiling required for fat loss to occur.

If we're going to put it down to numbers. Most people who eat animal foods can likely maximise muscular potential with protein intakes as low as 1.6g's per kilo of body weight per day, whereas this threshold for vegans may fall somewhere around 2g per kilo with 2.5g/kg likely around 'whats arguably optimal'. Unfortunately, really precise recommendations are difficult as protein requirements fall on a scale that may change based on the person & their situation. Just understand vegans probably need a little more.

Take home: Plant-based diets can be just as powerful as their animal containing counterparts in terms of muscle, it might just be less feasible from a real-world practically standpoint. A slightly higher total protein intake coming from a wider variety of food sources likely counteracts any potential drawbacks. The feasibility of protein targets and Calorie ceilings may be a little difficult if animal-based foods are off the menu, but it certainly can be done with some guidance from an FNC coach.



[1] Consumption of fat-free fluid milk after resistance exercise promotes greater lean mass accretion than does consumption of soy or carbohydrate in young, novice, male weightlifters.

How To Enjoy Indulgences Without Tracking

Reading Time

When Calorie conscious eating is the goal, often a 'fitting it in your macros' approach with some form of tracking is needed to avoid over-consuming Calories. However, this tracking approach probably isn't feasible in the long term, neither is completely avoiding treat foods if a non-tracking approach preferred.

So can you have indulgences without tracking?

Provided your relationship with food is sound, you have an informed understanding of how different foods affect daily Calorie intake, and your internal connection with hunger and food obsession is 'okay' you'll probably be fine eating some treat foods without 'having' to track it.

'Making room' (within healthful reason) by reducing carbohydrate and/or fat dense foods here and there can allow for logical amounts of treat foods. Another way of framing this could be a 'logical non-tracking food swap'.

For example if Gelato Messina was on your mind and you wanted to eat some with a friend later in the evening. Perhaps taking the peanut butter out of your oats that morning and having only a half serving of your usual pasta portion for lunch can create the 'Calorie room' for that logical amount of Messina (max 2 scoops... not a whole litre tub). Allowing you to enjoy the social occasion, enjoy the Messina you crave and not really 'need' to Calorie track it.

If you're going to test this sort of approach, it's important to acknowledge it can be a 'slippery slope'. The nutrient density of your diet and the poor ability of palatable, processed foods high in both fats and carbohydrates to suppress hunger should be considered.

If you approach logical portions of carbs & fats in a mindset of 'units of foods' you can make food swaps, or 'units of food swaps' that align with your 'cravings' and preferences at a given time.



At FNC we understand the importance of enjoying 'the finer things in life' (Gelato) without the anxiety of 'having to track it'. An FNC coach can help you along the road towards fat loss results maintenance, and logical enjoyment of 'life'.

To learn more about how we can improve not only your knowledge and understanding of nutrition, but also help you develop a greater relationship with food, contact us today.



4 Tips To Build New Habits

Reading Time

4 TIPS TO BUILD NEW HABITS

We live in a world full of information - literally called the information age.

We know what to do, but why don’t we do it?


Sometimes there is too much information, or even misinformation. Yet, when we know the fundamentals, the biggest bang for buck behaviours that are aligned with our goals and the person we want to be, we don’t do it. 

One of the reasons is due to our habits.

We are trying to undo years of actions and behaviours that have been practiced over and over again until they become habits. 

Our lives are essentially a sum of our habits. Our body composition, our happiness, our bank account, our successes. All a sum of our habits. We are what we repeatedly do. If we can change our habits, we can ultimately change our lives.


Today we are going to go through some strategies to help build new habits that are aligned with your desired identity - the person you wish to become.

Keep this thought in the back of your mind as you read this and even afterwards.

BIG DREAM, SMALL STEPS


Building habits is not based on a time domain. It is about getting successful reps in. How many times your practice that behaviour


So here are the 4 tips on how to help BUILD NEW HABITS and getting those successful reps in.


1. MAKE IT EASY

When Chinese weight-lifters first start learning their skill, they spend 12 months on a PVC pipe and 6 months on an empty barbell. Arguably the best in the world, spend 18 months practicing a new skill the easiest possible way to ensure the movement patterns become engrained, become a habit. That is how they get the successful reps in. If they added weight too early, their form may have faltered and the amount of good form successful reps would be reduced.


In nutrition we can MAKE IT EASY in 2 ways.


Create an environment where making the right choice is easy. We want to remove the barriers of practicing a desired behaviour whilst also making it more difficult to practice old behaviours. 

Make it easy to make Protein and NDFs your first choice by having them visible and easy to consume. Have a variety of Protein sources available in your fridge, freezer and pantry. Keep fresh and frozen fruits and veggies in an easily accessible area whilst reducing the ease at which you can choose more indulgent, processed, calorie dense items.

how to build habits - easy.png

The next is to cook and prepare meals within your skill level. When I first started my nutrition journey, I began with Kangaroo burger patties, frozen veggies, tins of tuna and microwave rice. I built the habits of making healthier choices that were aligned with my goals and then build upon that skill. 

Look for No Prep or Easy Prep options that don’t require much time or effort so it is easy to get started. 




A new habit shouldn’t feel like a challenge at the start. It should feel easy. 

2. MAKE IT OBVIOUS, MAKE A PLAN - IMPLEMENTATION INTENTIONS

We all have goals but a common misconception is that we lack motivation. What we actually lack is a plan. 

Studies have been done where people who actually wrote down a plan of when and where they intended to practice a new behaviour such as exercise we more likely to follow through with that intention when compared to groups who simply said they wanted to exercise more. 


This is known as an “Implementation Intention” and they are effective for sticking to goals in numerous studies. They increase the odds of sticking to a new behaviour such as studying, exercising, recycling, quitting smoking, going to bed earlier, etc.

how to build habits - plan.jpeg


People who make a specific plan for when and where they will perform a new habit are more likely to follow through. Often we are too vague with our goals and intentions. “I want to exercise more” or “I want to eat healthier”, but we never say where or when these habits will happen OR even what we intend to do. 


This process creates CLARITY in the actions you intend to implement.


Here is an example. 

I will [BEHAVIOUR] at [TIME] in [LOCATION]


I wanted to start reading more and be on my phone less to start the day so mine was.

I will READ MY BOOK at 530am in the LOUNGEROOM, after I shower every morning.

Want to get to the gym more? 

I will GO TO THE GYM at 5pm at CROSSFIT GEO.


Want to meditate?

I will MEDITATE at 8pm in my BEDROOM


For your nutrition, writing a plan of what you intend to eat can be how you implement this strategy. 

Want to add more PROTEIN to your diet?

I will add PROTEIN POWDER to my Oats and Berries for BREAKFAST at 8am.

I will eat CHICKEN with Rice and Veggies for LUNCH at 12pm.

I will eat YOGURT and Fruit for my SNACK at 4pm

I will eat FISH with Salad for my DINNER at 8pm. 

If you don’t plan out your actions, you rely on willpower or motivation but if you plan out when and where you will practice your desired behaviours, your goal has become real. 


3. MAKE IT ATTRACTIVE - FUN GETS IT DONE


Let’s be honest, if good habits were fun you’d already be doing them. When we find a task boring or monotonous, we may not want to practice it but we know that we need to practice them to get the successful reps in to form new habits. And, healthy nutrition habits are perceived to be pretty boring - meal prep, shopping, boring meals - but that doesn’t have to be the case.


There was an engineer who loved Netflix and wanted to exercise more, so he created an exercise bike that was powered Netflix if he cycled at a certain speed. 

What we can learn from this is that if we combine the fun stuff with the not so fun stuff, the latter is more likely to be completed. 

This is known as “Temptation Bundling”.

Pairing an action you want to do with an action that you need to do.

Pair something you love with a habit you want to build and you may find yourself doing it more, and even enjoying it. When we enjoy things, we do them more often - successful reps!


Personally I love music and podcasts. For me I like to pair that with my more boring tasks like cooking or shopping. 

how to build habits - fun.jpeg

How do you create a temptation bundle?

Create 2 columns. 

In the first column, write down a list of pleasures and temptations you enjoy doing. 

In the second, write a list of tasks and behaviours that you should be doing, that you want to start doing that are aligned with your desired identity - but you often procrastinate.

Then, pair them up.


Eg. Taking your headphones to listen to music while doing the shopping

Listening to music/podcasts/audio-books while walking to get your step ups

Watching Netflix while chopping the veggies or cooking dinner.


You’re more likely to find a behaviour attractive if you get to do one of your favourite things at the same time.




4. MAKE IT SATISFYING

The cardinal rule of behaviour change. 

What is immediately rewarded is repeated, what is immediately punished is avoided.

Reward yourself immediately after completing a new habits. “If the puppy does a trick, it gets a treat” - yes you are a puppy in the metaphor.

And no, we aren’t saying to have some chocolate after you eat some Protein and NDFs. 

how to build habits - satisfy.jpeg

Our goals are delayed rewards that obviously take time, so we need an immediate reward to stay on track. We need some reinforcement to keep practicing the healthy eating behaviours. 

With nutrition, we can increase the satisfaction of a meal by making it taste good. WHAT? A healthy meal that tastes good? It can’t be true! But it is!! Using flavours, herbs, spices, seasonings, and low calorie sauces can reward us to make this a repeated behaviour while in the background our delayed reward of health and body composition are accumulating.


In SUMMARY

Make It Easy: Cook at your skill level, Control your environment

Make It Obvious: Make a Plan in advance

Make It Attractive: Bundle fun stuff with new habits.

Make It Satisfying: Reward yourself with flavoursome goal aligned foods.


As previously mentioned, there is no shortage of nutrition information out there. It is important then that we find a way to apply it to our lives that is easy, obvious, attractive and satisfying to ensure we enjoy the process and get the successful reps in to form these habits that ultimately shape our lives.



At FNC, you get the nutrition education - the knowledge needed to get you towards your goals. 

You also get the guidance and the tools of how to implement the knowledge. 

Plus you get the support of the FNC Coaches and the FNC community.

If you would like to learn more about our services, our education program, our community, contact us today by clicking the link below.


Knowledge without action is wastefulness and action without knowledge is foolishness.


REFERENCES:

Atomic Habits by James Clear




5 Tips for Maintaining Muscle Whilst Dieting

Reading Time

Top 5 Tips for Maintaining Muscle Mass Whilst Dieting

  1. Resistance training

  2. Set your deficit

  3. Protein target split across 4 meals / 4 hours apart

  4. Measure progress, adjust deficit if needed

  5. Consistently sleep at least 7 hours a night

Minimising muscle loss during a diet

The very simple answer is resistance training and protein at each meal. If you are not lean, don’t want to track food intake closely and your goal is to drop some body fat whilst minimising muscle loss, this is probably fine as a guide. 

In nearly all cases of dieting and weight loss, the goal is actually to reduce body fat mass whilst maintaining as much muscle mass as possible. The loss of some muscle and strength during a diet is thought of as a reality of having a reduced amount of energy available for a sustained amount of time. 


How to predict your rate of weight loss
A fairly consistent recommendation is to aim for a body weight reduction of about 0.5-1% per week during a diet, to try and minimise any potential muscle and strength loss.(1) The larger the deficit being the predictor of more muscle loss. (3). There is another school of thought that you may consider dieting as hard and fast as possible, get down to goal weight / goal leanness faster, then finish the diet earlier in order to be able to then start training again at maintenance energy levels.

First you need to have a good idea of your maintenance Calories. You could use an online calculator or track your food/drink intake and body weight for a couple of weeks. If your weight is fairly stable, you will have your average maintenance Calories. 

The 3500 Calorie rule, as it’s known, is more of a general guideline which estimates that to lose 1 pound of fat (about 0.5kg) you need to a Calorie deficit of about 3500 Calories. So if you were 100kg and were aiming to lose 0.5% per week, you would estimate that you need to average a weekly deficit of about 3500 Calories. It is not an exact science though and may need to be altered over time depending on progress. (2).

The website of the USA National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases hosts a “Body Weight Planner” which is an interesting resource for looking at estimated rates of weight loss and could give you some insight and reasonable expectations about you goal and the length of your diet. (https://www.niddk.nih.gov/bwp)


Training

It’s a bit of a “use it or lose it” story with muscle. Continuing a resistance training program whilst dieting is more important than nutrition when it comes to minimising reductions in muscle and strength.(3) 


Rates of weight loss and protein in studies

A major consideration is going to be your starting point.


In a study of overweight young men who were not regularly participating in resistance training, the study gave a great insight into “newbie” gains and gaining muscle while losing fat. Two groups were both set a 40% Calorie reduction for 4 weeks. One group consumed 1.2 grams of protein / kg body weight / day and the other group 2.4 grams of protein / kg body weight / day. Both groups lost the same amount of body weight, the lower protein group maintained lean body mass and the high protein group, despite a 40% reduction in energy intake, actually increased lean body mass. Also of note is the difference in average protein content per meal in the groups. The low protein group averaged 0.23 grams / kg body weight / meal whereas the high protein group averaged 0.48 grams of protein / kg body weight / meal.(4) The amount of the amino acid leucine per meal is a driver of muscle protein synthesis (muscle growth) and it is estimated that around 30-40 grams of protein per meal would be needed to reach a leucine threshold high enough to stimulate muscle protein synthesis (1).

In a study of track and field athletes, two groups were assigned either a 750 Calorie/day deficit (24% deficit) or a 300 Calorie/day deficit. Both groups consumed 2.1 grams of protein / kg body weight / day. After the four weeks of dieting, the larger deficit group lost 2.2kg body weight on average, with 0.5 kg being fat free mass (body weight - bones and fat). The smaller deficit group lost 0.4kg body weight on average with 0.2kg being fat free mass. So with a larger deficit, a little more fat free mass was lost but significantly more fat mass. What is really interesting about this study is that athletes with a body fat percentage of more than 10% at the start of the study were able to preserve more fat free mass. (5) In practicality, except in very specific sports and physique competitions, it’s unlikely many people would (or should) try to diet into single figure body fat percentages anyway. 


An interesting study of young athletes actually compared rates of weight loss, with one group targeting a reduction of 0.7% bodyweight per week and another above the mentioned guidelines of 1.4% bodyweight per week. The slower group had a 19% Calorie deficit and the faster group 30%. The slower group consumed 1.6 grams of protein / kg body weight / day and the faster 1.4 grams of protein / kg body weight / day. Both groups trained 4x per week. Both groups dieted to lose about 5.5% bodyweight. The fast group took 5.3 weeks on average and the slow group 8.5 weeks. The slow group actually increased lean body mass a little whilst losing fat and the fast group lost a tiny amount of lean body mass. (6) What would be interesting would be if this study had the fast group then consume their new maintenance Calories and continue training up until the 8.5 week mark to then compare the two methods. Would the fast group have regained that minimal loss and potentially gained some more muscle in those 3 weeks? There is also a difference, although slight, in protein intake and in reality, whilst the fast group was targeting 1.4% weight loss per week, they actually average 1%. 


In a study of young athletes who were regularly resistance training (4-5x per week) they were seperated into a lower protein group 1 grams of protein / kg body weight / day and a high protein group 2.3 grams of protein / kg body weight / day and a high. Both groups had a 40% reduction in energy intake for 2 weeks and lost a similar amount of body weight. The low protein group however lost about 5x more lean body mass than the high protein group on average. (7)

Those studies are some “food” for thought when considering the size of your intended deficit. 


Protein

We’ve already touched on protein a little and the studies above have some interesting data on protein targets across a day and at each meal. 


If dieting, the amount of protein consumed should be higher than someone focussing on muscle gain or re-comp. This is due to the Calorie restriction during a diet meaning that less carbs are available for energy and some protein may be broken down and used in place (3). How high this protein intake should be will depend on the individual circumstances. Looking at the above studies, 1.2 grams / kg body weight / day was enough to preserve lean body mass in untrained overweight males when combining diet with a new resistance training program. However under the same conditions, 2.4 grams / kg / day was actually better


In athletic and training groups, the range of 1.6 - 2.3 grams of protein / kg body weight / day performed well in slow and faster diets in relation to the preservation of muscle. 

A systematic review of protein intakes for athletes and resistance trained individuals gives a guideline of 2.3 - 3.1 grams of protein / kg body weight / day scaled up with the size of the energy deficit and leanness of the individual. (8)


Fats and Carbs

After choosing the size of the deficit you are going to aim for and your protein intake target, whatever Calories you have left to budget will go to carbs and fats. You probably don’t want to go below 20-25% of total Calories from fat, then the rest would probably be best spent on carbs as fuel for training. Remembering that training is most important for muscle retention. However personal preference really can determine these ratios. (3).


Sleep

Sleep and recovery will be important, not only so you feel as good as possible whilst dieting and can train well. It could also play a role in how much weight loss in a diet is fat and how much is muscle. A study of overweight and sedentary adults had groups with a sleep opportunity of 5.5 hours or 8.5 hours per night. The short sleep time resulted in 60% more weight loss from fat free mass compared to the longer sleep group. In the short sleep group, 25% of weight loss was fat mass, whilst in the longer sleep group 56% of weight loss was fat mass. These groups were not resistance training, however the results would certainly encourage giving yourself the opportunity to sleep longer. (9).

Summary and Recommendations

  1. Be very clear with your goals, expectations, starting point, length of diet and best practice recommendations. 

  2. Have a resistance training program and stick to it. 

  3. Know or calculate predicted maintenance Calories.

  4. Set your deficit based on step 1 and strongly consider the 0.5-1% weight loss guideline.

  5. Set your protein between 1.6 - 3.1 grams / kg body weight / day depending your circumstances in step 1.

  6. Spread protein intake out across your meals, with probably at least 4 meals and close to 30 grams of protein per meal as minimum. 

  7. Calculate your remaining Calories and distribute to fats and carbs, not going under about 20-25% of total Calories from fats (or about 0.5 grams / kg body weight / day).

  8. Monitor progress with a number of methods, scale weight, hip and waist measurements, progress photos. Also monitor training performance, mood, sleep and take all into account regularly. You may need to change your plan at some point depending on all of these variables. 

  9. When happy with your body composition, calculate your maintenance Calories based of your new weight and start consuming that amount of energy whilst continuing to monitor the same measures of progress. 


To learn more about how a nutrition coach can help you maintain your lean body mass whilst dieting, contact us today.

Fuelling Exercise 101 - Why, How, What and When

Reading Time

FUELLING EXERCISE 101 - WHY, HOW, WHAT & WHEN

If achieving your best possible sports performance for training adaptations or competition is of significant importance to you, how you fuel exercise, training and competition is worth consideration.

Unfortunately simply telling you ‘what to do’, won’t cut it, because fuelling exercise is far more complicated than what a single Instagram infographic can achieve. With that being said, once you have a clear understanding of your own situation and needs, working out what aligns with that, including the when and how much, can be a pretty simple step by step process.

This article aims to break down the things you need to know, into three checkboxes that will cover 99% of people who care about fuelling their exercise.  

Khan Games.jpg

Preface: Outside of basic, most important recovery considerations like sleep, sufficient protein, stress management, plant intake and the overall healthfulness of the diet, there are a few main points to address when it comes to fuelling best exercise specific to nutrition.

The 3 checkboxes include.  

1. Hydration. 

2. Caffeine.  

3. Carbohydrate availability with gastrointestinal stress in mind.

There is quite a large caveat to everything here, but fortunately it only applies to a very small percentage of the population, and of that population it applies rarely. If you’re a very high-level endurance athlete, currently in an acute phase of training (not competition) where you’re seeking training adaptations (not best possible performance) then the below still applies, but there are nuances that aren’t covered that are relevant to you and you only. For everyone else who isn’t the aforementioned, the below is all you really need to know. 


Below covers the whys, when it's relevant, and practical hows of the above three points. 


1. Hydration
Preface: Hydration does not have to come from drinking water exclusively. This is why the term ‘fluid’ is used below. 

Seemingly a no brainer this is one big one that often gets overlooked and forgotten that can notably improve your work capacity and performance. Being in a state of poor hydration has been shown to impair sports performance significantly, and even pose risk of severe illness and death [1].

When it comes to hydration the goal is... hydration not hypo or hyperhydration. Yes, overhydration is something to be aware of. There are many proposed ways to control hydration, but the way that works just fine in almost all instances is “listening to your body”... A terrible phrase used by complete nutrition morons very often, yes, but relevant in this situation. Simply drinking to thirst and being aware of “how you feel” (another equally moronic phase) with an awareness of internal and external cues like urine color, is very often sufficient provided you’re able to stay vigilant ' and ‘on top of hydrated' [2].

Having it in the back of your mind is a good idea, especially around exercise because dehydration can really creep up on you. Furthermore, ensuring you start exercising well-hydrated is paramount and deserves extra emphasis, so do your best to avoid feeling like you should be better hydrated prior to an exercise bout. Consider factors like climate, intensity and exercise duration alongside your internal and exercise thirst cues.

Sometimes more quantitative means of hydration intake are a good idea. Dosing 5-10mL per kilogram of body weight 1-2 hours prior to activity is a reasonable start [3]. Applying habitual intake ranges can be a good idea but, of course heavily limited by climate, activity levels, mass of the human and more.

Rates at which we excrete fluid from our body can be measured and calculated as ‘sweat rates’. The use of sweat rates as a guide to fluid intakes has many flaws [2], it's a little inconvenient, invasive at times and full of variables so it should be used to just get a ‘rough idea', of sufficient fluid intakes. Basically determining sweat rates involves measuring body weight, urine output, fluid intake and sometimes more invasive things before and after a bout of exercise. Again many variables can cause issues with reliability, relevance is low and it’s need is rare so I'll leave sweat rates at that. 


Hydration & having carbs in fluid while you exercise.
Hydration gets a little more complicated when whatever you drink during exercise also aims to fuel via 'during exercise carbohydrates' (more on this below). What I mean by this is drinking something with carbs(or 'sugar') in it while you train. Chunking a random scoop of a 'carb powder' like maltodextrin into a shaker with water to a ratio that looks ‘about right’ might be a sub-par idea. The issue is, a carbohydrate concentration that is too great can worsen hydration status and impair nutrient/fuel absorption, both of which impair performance. If the concentration is too great, the body will draw fluid into the gut to dilute it. [5]

This is easily solved with a carbohydrate concentration of 6-8%. Isotonic sports drinks do this really well, that's why they're a ‘sports drink’ and that's why they work, despite what your high school rugby coach said about sports drinks being 'bad'. If the drink has between 6-8g of carbohydrates per 100ml of fluid you're good to go. If you're going to mix it yourself, measure it, don't guess it! 

2. Caffeine 

Caffeine is one of the few supplements that really works [6]… like actually does something helpful. During training your habitual intake is likely just fine and it’s a good idea to save ‘the big dog dose’ for when you really need it like in competition or really hard phases of training. Many may not be aware (including high-level athletes) that the real world amounts of caffeine needed to sit within the ergogenic dose ranges, which basically means the range of caffeine intake prior to exercise that notably improves sports performance are massive! This dose is between 3-6mg per kilogram of body weight [6]. For a 75kg athlete achieving the ergogenic dose of caffeine would require between ~3.5-5.5 regular back coffee or ~2.5-3.5 full-size Monster energy drinks. Again, habitual intake or the intake you 'feel to be sufficient' will do fine during training phases, but if you really want a caffeine kick up the ass, the ergogenic caffeine range 60 minutes or less prior to starting an exercise bout will achieve this effect. 

3. Carbohydrate availability with gastrointestinal stress in mind. 

This is a big one and by far the most nuanced component of fuelling exercise & sport, so it will need to be further broken down into smaller sections. 


The body has three fuel sources available, protein, carbs and fats. But fuelling isn't the primary function of all three and in an exercise setting one of them heavily fuels the work while the others don’t contribute much at all. 

Protein serves primarily as a building block, or 'bricks within the structure of the human', but thanks to some complex metabolic stuff, protein can be converted into fuel for ATP regeneration (the fundamental energy currency) when really needed. So now that we know protein isn't really a source of fuel, that leaves carbs and fats.     


Fats are a few things including a fuel source, and a pretty often used one. But fats don't really fuel exercise... The role of fats in the context of fuel is primarily centred around everyday existence. Fats are utilised within the mitochondria of the cell, through the citric acid cycle (also known as the Kreb cycle), but as mentioned they're almost always not the predominant fuel of hard exercise/activity, especially anaerobic (without air (very intense work)) activity because they can’t be oxidised (used) fast enough to regenerate ATP at a sufficient rate, to fuel really hard activity. [9,10]. It’s undeniable that higher carbohydrate diets promote best performance [11]

So if you're planning on doing exercise, glucose (carbohydrates) is your friend. (Thanks for that one Charles P). The idea of eating fats prior to activity to fuel exercise is almost always a fallacy (unless you’re that high level endurance athlete in training blocks I mentioned before) unless the body has no glucose available (due to prolonged carbohydrate restriction and glycogen depletion (glycogen = the bodies 'storage tanks' of carbs)). The body will always preferentially use glucose when exercise gets hard, provided it is available, and for good reason. 


So in short, if planned exercise is going to be hard and you want to perform your best, you want glucose to be available when you need it. [7]  


So what does glucose availability really mean?   

Carbohydrate availability doesn't always absolutely mean you 'need' to eat carbs or 'sugar' (fundamentally the same thing once it’s floating in the blood) prior to exercise and very often doing so will make very little. Pre-exercise carbs go from 'not really needed', to 'why not do it’, to 'an absolute need to perform optimally' depending on the type, duration, and intensity of exercise.


What glucose availability simply means is whether the body has glucose available at it's disposal when it's required, which means keeping 'the glucose storage tanks' away from empty. When I say storage tanks, as mentioned before I'm referring to glycogen which is present in the liver and muscle. Some extra glucose is also present and available in the bloodstream, more so after carbohydrate ingestion [9,10]. If there are carbohydrates in these ‘tanks’ the body has fuel to use. The problem is, glycogen runs empty if you don't top up what you previously used. The more activity you do the emptier it gets and the more you need to keep it topped. 


So now that you’re aware that you need to eat carbs to fuel best exercise performance, the question now becomes a case of dose, type, and timing of carbohydrate. Unfortunately it’s not a matter of covering one at a time, in the aforementioned order. While there is a hierarchy starting at dose, all three factors heavily integrate and influence one another, so I’ll do my best to break it down.

Let's start with the thing that matters to all who do exercise... the dose. 


The dose

As mentioned the dose of carbohydrates needed to continually fuel exercise comes down to the demands for it within the umbrella of situational Calorie ceilings. Carbohydrate needs are not simply a factor of matching intake with use because we need to consider Calories and of course where they’re coming from. While you can manipulate Calories through protein and fats, as they probably should stay fixed throughout various total Calorie intake fluctuations, for the purpose of this article we’ll assume both protein and fats are sufficient and not beyond. If a Calorie deficit is present because you're in a dedicated fat loss phase, your carbohydrate dose will likely fall slightly short of ‘optimal sports performance requirements’ in order to create that deficit of energy required for fat loss to happen. If gaining weight is the goal, a surplus of Calories and carbohydrates relative to usage applies.

Carbohydrates are not essential to survival and baseline human function, which means protein and fats need to be covered first. But who wants to 'function at baseline', especially if you’re into sport and exercise? Once sufficient protein and fats are present within the diet to ensure optimal function and health, the rest of your ' Calorie budget' can and should be dedicated to carbs if you want to best fuel exercise. So just to be clear, total carbohydrate dose is limited by how many Calories you have to work with only after protein and fat needs are dealt with. Most of the time, dealing with protein and fats still leaves a massive amount of left over Calories for the good stuff (carbohydrate). At this stage you might realise that carbs and fats are almost fixed with total energy needs being a case of manipulating carbohydrates, meaning carbs and Calories go almost hand in hand. While there are limitations to this, more or less this is a great way of going about it. 


So now we know what our underlying limit to carb intake is we can get to the point and work out how much rice, and pasta we can eat. So who gets how much?


General recreational gym-goer, CrossFit dad, daily jogger, Sunday cyclist with the lycra boys. 

Yeh, so you train for general health, fat loss and enjoyment. Your exercise intensity is challenging and indeed hard enough to warrant a decent hit of carbs. But you don't exercise for hours and hours and relative to athletes you don’t 'really' exercise that hard. Carbs yes, but your requirements can likely be achieved through simply eating “healthy” as per the general government guidelines ranges. Which basically means sufficient fruits (2 serves, totalling ~ 300g), vegetables (5 serves, totalling ~400g) [8], beans, legumes, and whole grains will cover you off without the need for anything additional. Eating a varied, healthful wholefoods diet with heaps of whole grains and fibrous plants will likely do the job. For most general folks exercising mostly for health, total carbohydrate requirements might fall between ~1-4g per kilogram of body weight per day. 


Gym bro, trying to get jacked?

You train really hard, bodybuilding style and there is nothing more important in life than getting jacked, so you can impress your mates and absolutely zero chicks. In reality, your training isn't that glycogen depleting and nowhere near that of certain other sporting endeavours. With that in mind if you’re trying to gain muscle mass, it’s a good idea to be in a surplus of Calories. Growing muscle can become quite an energy intensive process, especially when combined with the positive metabolic adaptations to overfeeding. Calorie and therefore carbohydrate needs can become pretty significant warranting the use of yummy, high Calorie per bite foods to viably meet high carbohydrate demands. For muscle growth once sufficient protein & fats have been dealt with you probably have enough room within your Calorie needs to consume anywhere between ~2-6g per kilogram of body weight in carbohydrates. 


You're an athlete, who takes sports seriously. You might even be a pro. 

The range of carbohydrate needs with in this category is broad because the amounts of exercise athletes do varies so much depending on how 'high level' they are, the sport they do and how much they train. The needs of a professional ultra-endurance runner during a race far exceeds someone like a crossfitter even if they train multiple times a day by several-fold. Athletes in hard training blocks, doing hours and hours of training per day may need up to if not more than 12g per kilogram of body weight as carbohydrates [11].

For our 75kg athlete mentioned before who was shocked at the idea of necking 3.5 full-sized Monster energy drinks before his mountain bike race, this equates to a very significant 900g of carbs per day. This is a lot of food, which will require food selection that can be easily consumed in great amounts with higher Calorie yields like sports drinks, bagels w jam, ‘sugary’ cereal, and white rice with maple syrup all over said rice, to viably meet needs. If you think it's possible to do it through wholemeal bread and baked potato, you're straight-up kidding yourself. Unless of course, you want to perform like shit because you've got about 20 kilos of food sitting in your gut, and you like the idea of coughing up blood because the several hundred grams of dietary fibre has completely fried your insides. So if you're an athlete with these massive needs, 'sort of liking junk food' probably won't cut it. You need to love the thought of CocoPops for breakfast and Weis fruit sorbet for dessert, not only is meeting needs important for your performance but also your health with low energy available in sports (LEA, or RED-S) being such a prevalent, very damaging and unrecognised issue. [12]

Okay, so we know roughly who needs what amounts of carbohydrates. Does timing matter?

Prefix to this timing and type section: Dose is king!
The higher the required dose, the longer the carbs will need to get past the blood and into the gut. It gets a little more complex because different carbs need different times to be available for use. As you can see all variables need to be considered, therefore the recommendations below regarding timing and type are rough broad ranges. An understanding of dose first, and time frame second will dictate the type. 


Carb timing

Remember I mentioned glycogen, and how it's stored within the muscle and liver? Well if you deplete glycogen through exercise and then eat carbs to replete glycogen but don't exercise after that, muscle glycogen will still be full for ages and ages. However the body uses liver glycogen at rest which means even after an overnight fast where you've slept in bed doing nothing, liver glycogen stores become depleted. One of the main roles of liver glycogen is to regulate blood glucose concentration or the amount of glucose in the blood (blood sugar) [10]. This may indeed be impaired a little bit when you wake up, but for many instances, what's in the muscle is sufficient to fuel exercise. 


Carbs in the hours prior to exercise. (pre-workout)


General recreational gym-goers, CrossFit dad, daily jogger, Sunday cyclist with the lycra boys. 

For most folks there is more than enough glucose available in the muscle to fuel any exercise you do, so a reasonably high level of exercise performance can be achieved even in a fasted state after a nights sleep. But it doesn't hurt to eat more carbs and it might help you exercise harder even if it's mostly placebo, so having carbs in the hours before exercise is a good idea and something I would advise if it’s practically feasible, but I wouldn’t lose sleep over it (literally). If you have to be in the office by 8am and have no time to eat before your 6am gym session, don't worry about waking up at 4am to eat, the glucose you synthesised from carbs feedings the day prior has you covered. If you really want some glucose prior to exercise, maybe even because you just like it, and feel good when you do. Just drinking a bottle of sports drink upon waking is a good idea, and something that’s recommended for hydration after a full night of sleep.


Gym bro, trying to get jacked?

Unfortunately for Gym bro, most of the time the above still applies. You probably don’t need carbohydrates in the hours before exercise to perform reasonably well. But as mentioned carbohydrates in the hours prior to exercise has benefits within and outside of glucose availability, and are certainly worthwhile if feasible [10]. Carbohydrate ingestion in the hours prior to exercise, even if muscle glycogen is already full, offers performance benefits via the central nervous system [11] which I think in the context of someone who has a respectable interest in maximising training adaptations is worthwhile considering. Even the notion of ‘carbs before training makes you feel good’ alone makes it worthwhile nailing, especially if you need every helping hand you can get to make it through some tough sessions. So again, while pre exercise carbohydrates are not a ‘do or die’ factor, here is the thing though… The whole purpose, and idea of bodybuilding is to stand out, so meeting ‘baseline needs’ doesn't cut it. With that said, consuming carbohydrates in the hours prior to exercise now matters a whole lot more. They’re a fantastic idea and absolutely worth it, if you’re serious about getting the most from your hard efforts in the gym. 


You're an athlete, who takes sports seriously. You might even be a pro.  

You use a lot of carbs, and you're about to use a shit load more so you need every 'storage tank' of carbs fully topped up prior to the exercise or you might ‘run out of fuel’. Granted even elite level athletes will need to exercise for several hours to get close to depleting stored glycogen, so in that light, carbohydrates in the hours prior to exercise are still only a big factor for endurance sports. Yes, for these endurance, long duration folks, you can turn to fats for fuel, but it's at this point where the duration of exercise is so long the intensity will probably be low enough where fats can actually be oxidised fast enough to regenerate ATP as a sufficient rate in those who are well trained.
So does this mean pre exercise carbohydrate is only a consideration for athletes about to run for ~3 or more hours? No, because as mentioned previously liver glycogen depletes even at rest, so you’ll want to ensure you’re ‘topping the tanks up’.
Furthermore carbs aren't just stored in the muscle and liver, we can store smaller amounts in the blood. As mentioned, elevations in blood sugar concentration when starting exercise has its own central nervous system related performance benefits.
Carbohydrates in the hours prior to exercise are worthwhile and again just a great time to eat carbs in general from a practical perspective. 


Intra workout carbs. 

Anyone who trains hard for less than an hour.

While the athlete's fitness, along with exercise type, and intensity are important factors. It's still heavily secondary to duration. In short, exercise that lasts longer than an hour can benefit from some 'during exercise' carbohydrate ingestion, but 'intra' carbs for exercise that lasts less than an hour probably won't help much at all [11]. But again we ask the practical question; does that mean carbs during exercise is bad if you train less than an hour? No, but there probably isn't a massive need for it in order to maximise performance. This almost certainly covers off the 'average Joe' category and more or less most recreational gym-goers interested in muscle growth.

Anyone who trains hard for more than an hour.  

Pretty much the only time when drinking carbs whilst exercising helps to a notable extent is if you're training for more than ~60 minutes. For exercise lasting 1-3 hours, ~30-60g per hour is the upper end of what 'you can handle' (more on this later). For exercise that spans beyond 3 hours up to ~90g of carbohydrates per hour can be consumed.[11]

Post-workout carbs

Here's the thing, pre-workout carbs starts when the last bout of exercise finished... Which means post-workout carbs are actually pre-workout carbs. Keep that in mind when you read this section if your brain hasn't already exploded from that concept. 


Anyone who trains once a day. 

If you exercise once a day or not that frequently, just eating carbs over the day after your exercise session gets you the replenishment you need. You have plenty of time to replete glycogen, there is no rush, so timing really doesn't matter. This covers off 'general recreational gym-goer, CrossFit dad, daily jogger, and Sunday cyclist with the lycra boys'. 


I train once a day but I'm a 'gym bro, trying to get jacked', I need carbs after training don't I?

I know it's cool to post about the fact you ate a whole box of CocoPops post-training (shit I was that asshole), but you probably don't you need carbs to maximise post-workout anabolism. But what about that thing... you know "something to do with carbs putting stuff into cells". If the objective is muscle functional adaptations for endurance sport, growth for performance or aesthetics, or muscle retention during fat loss, the goal is to create a net positive balance of protein turnover on average over time. Which means muscle protein synthesis or building (MPS) exceeds muscle protein breakdown (MPB). In a nutritional sense this is a factor of protein ingestion, carbs don't boost MPS, but it's been said carbohydrates post exercise arrests MPB. However, post exercise carbohydrates still probably aren’t needed with research showing MPB is maximally suppressed through protein alone. So post-workout carbs probably matter less. [13]

But that 'driving nutrients into cells thing'? Yes, carbohydrate ingestion increases blood sugar concentration which triggers the beta cells of the pancreas to secrete insulin. Insulin acts as an Uber driver who drives the sugar around ‘the town’ to the cell entrance (the night clubs).Upon arrival said sugar is greeted by the bouncer who has come to the club entrance to let sugar in. This bouncers name is GLUT4, and his job at the club (the cell) is to let the sugars in. This process of him leaving the inside of the club (the D floor) to greet guests at the door is called 'GLUT4 translocation'. This is a valid reason to need carbs post-training, but exercise alone causes GLUT4 translocation [14].  


So does this mean post-workout ingestion of carbs helps grow muscle? Maybe, but probably not a whole lot. Does this mean post-workout carbs don't matter? Probably not needed to maximise adaptations to the previous exercise bout. But if you're a big guy/girl who has a lot of Calories to work with, and therefore carbs to play around with, having a decent chunk of your daily targets post-exercise is a great idea, even on a practicality level. 


Anyone who trains multiple times a day or has two very hard bouts of exercise close to each other in terms of time proximity.

This is when timing matters. Why does it matter? Because you have limited time to replace the glucose you previously used. Those storage tanks within the muscle and liver need to be refilled before your next bout of activity. The closer to the end of the workout you ingest carbs the greater the rate at which you'll replenish glycogen [16]. Adding caffeine to the mix may enhance this rate even more.[15] If this is you, get those carbs in fast, but carb timing is 3 dimensional and goes hand in hand with 'carbohydrate type'. (see below)


Carbohydrate type

When we refer to the 'carbohydrate type', we’re technically talking about different saccharides, combinations of, or the difference between simple sugars and complex carbs. In layman's terms we’re talking 'quick' vs 'slow' carbs.

You might have heard about the terms 'high and low GI', you might have seen food marketing based on this thing called 'GI'. As you may have guessed GI basically refers to the 'quickness' of the carb. Lower GI carbs typically represent themselves as high fibre plants and grains whereas higher GI or 'quick' carbs present themselves in the form of 'whiter, junkier, sugary, style carb-dense foods. It's important to note that carb-dense foods fall on a continuum within this range so it’s not exactly a matter of quick or slow, but more so how quick/slow.
The difference on a slightly more technical level refers to how rapidly the food empties the stomach, the rate at which it's absorbed through the intestinal wall, how rapidly it enters the blood, how quickly it increases blood sugar concentration and therefore and most importantly how quickly it can be available for use or storage. Any carbohydrate we ingest is basically glucose by the time it gets into the bloodstream. Any carbohydrate that is already that or something very close to it, doesn’t need much ‘processing or breaking down’, within the ‘processing plant’ that is the digestive tract, so it’s a relatively quick process. If something enters the gut in a ‘very unprocessed’ state, a lot of ‘stuff’ needs to happen before it is ready for the blood stream, which takes time.

At the end of all this ‘processing’ that occurs in the gut, the single overarching limiting factor of how quickly we can ingest carbs for use, is how rapidly the cell can use them. At the muscle cell level, the upper-end rate of carbohydrate oxidation is around ~2g per minute [16]. But almost always the actual limiting factor is the gastrointestinal part of the process. (more on this later)


The tricky part here is, appropriate selection of a carbohydrate-dense food source depends mostly on timing but also dose. The goal is to a) have the carbohydrates ready for use when it’s time to exercise, and b) consider the cross over of dose and time frames to avoid the occurrence of uncomfortable amounts of food just sitting in the gut during exercise and the performing impairing gastrointestinal stress that come with that.

If we remember that pre workout nutrition starts when the last workout ended we realise that much of this rides on how far away your next exercise bout is, and how quickly you need to repleat the ‘carbohydrate tanks’ to ensure fuel is available.

So let's cover what is appropriate when.


'Mega quick carbs'
When: Less than 60 minutes before the workout, during the workout (if exercising for ~<1 hour) or when massive amounts of carbs are needed.
Sports drink, or something ‘really sugary’ like energy gels and maybe lollies (if you’re okay with being ever so slightly suboptimal). These are the food sources that can be available for use by the contracting muscle as soon as possible. They’re nothing but carbohydrates and come with no baggage in the form of fibre, protein and fat, that’ll slow things down. If you need glucose, you need it quick, then this will do the job in a way that will least likely cause gastrointestinal stress because it doesn’t pose much workload on the gut, as minimal ‘processing’ is needed to get it ready for the bloodstream. 


'Quicker carbs'
When: ~1-3 hours before exercise, upper end of time frames if larger dose is needed.
Sugary cereal, bagels with jam, white rice with maple syrup. ‘The whiter carbs’. These foods contain mostly carbs, very little to no fibre and not much of anything else (Protein & fats), their surface area is often relatively low compared to their Calorie content, so they’re Calorie dense. Due to the aforementioned their ability to very quickly pass the gut, get into the blood, and be available for use makes them appropriate for those who need large amounts quickly. If you’ve just finished hard exercise and have another one coming up very shortly these tick the box. But they’re almost always not appropriate as during exercise carbohydrates. So if intra exercise carbs are needed you’re best sticking with sports drinks (which will also provide hydration) and things like ‘energy gels’. 


'Slower 'healthy' carbs'. 

1 hour before exercise at the very least, only if the dose is very low, but most often several hours are needed between ingestion and exercise with these ‘slower, healthier carbs’.
This category covers high fibre whole grains and plants in the form of fruits and veg. So basically ‘healthy eating’. These foods have relatively higher surface areas and require more processing to be converted into a form that's compatible with the working muscle cell. They’re low Calorie per bite and physically difficult to ingest in large amounts. So if you need a lot of carbs quickly these are not for you. Most folks can stomach the ‘most people’ requirements of carbs that is probably around 1-4g of carbohydrates per kilogram of body weight through exclusively ‘healthy carbs’ without the need to swap things like sweet potato for white rice. 


After the workout....
As mentioned before, post exercise is just another word for pre exercise, but often many hours if not days pre exercise. If you need glucose fast, refer to the timing part. If you need large amounts of glucose fast, refer to the type part, with timing in mind. If you don’t need glucose that fast, then post workout carbs isn’t a big concern. Simply just eating enough carbs over the next ~24 hours is all you need to do. If you have heaps of time but a lot of carbs to refill, then you might want to start now, and often with things that require very little work from the gut. 


Why is carb type and timing important?

Availability for use, rates of gastric emptying, intestinal absorption and GIS.
As mentioned before the rate at which glucose can be ingested is limited by the amount that's needed and the rate it can be used. But beyond a certain reasonable point the delivery of the fuel to the bloodstream is the limiting factor. What I mean by that is the gut, or how quickly carbs can go from you mouth to floating in the blood.

Why does this relate to gastrointestinal stress (GIS)?
An estimated 30-50% of distance runners experience intestinal problems [18]. While less-so a concern and prevalence in other sporting endeavours, it’s still very much something to consider because no one likes being all bloated and gassy when they exercise, and it’s occurrence will likely limit ability to perform. The gut doesn’t like being overworked and forced into overdrive. If you give it too much to process, too fast it’ll get angry. If you give it something that doesn’t require much ‘processing’ you can get away with giving it a lot and it won’t get angry. Furthermore the gut, gets ‘less workers’ during exercise, that's because the body is a little more focused on the task at hand being… the exercise itself. When I say workers I’m talking blood flow. During exercise blood flow to the gut is reduced which therefore means the work capacity of the gut is significantly impaired. During prolonged hard exercise blood flow can be reduced to the gut by up to ~80%. [19]

If you’ve got food in the gut waiting to be processed while you’re exercising the stomach starts to ‘bitch and moan’, by going into a state of gastrointestinal stress. Obviously this makes you feel like shit, which even practically speaking certainly impairs your exercise performance potential. Furthermore, that fuel you’ve got sitting in the gut there probably won’t get absorbed into the blood to its full extent, so now you’ve got fuel you ingested being ‘ejected’ from the body unused. What I mean here is malabsorption.

Outside of a few obvious things like eating a sufficient fibre intake to promote healthy general gastrointestinal function and health (‘gut health’) mostly from plant matter, getting enough sleep and managing stress. Avoiding NSAIDs close to exercise [4] and staying hydrated (with a 6-8% carbohydrate concentration if the fluid itself contains them) are worthwhile considerations in avoiding GIS occurrence during exercise. 

So there you have it, fuelling exercise 101 for best sports performance. The best thing to do from here is refer back to your situation and determine where you sit on each continuum. Then from there you can determine your requirements (dose) and fit type and timing into your eating, training and ‘life’ routine. Do the basics well, sprinkle a bit of caffeine on top, stay hydrated and you’re pretty much the whole way towards best fuelling exercise through a bit of extra trial and error. So do be prepared to try a few dose, time and type combos to get an idea of what works best for you and what you can and can not tolerate.

Key take home points.

1. Hydrate to thirst, in a proactive manner, especially in and around exercise with an awareness of internal cues. Consider climate, exercise duration, sweat rates & avoid hyper-hydration.

2. Aim to maximise fuel availability prior and during exercise. Start exercise in a glycogen depleted state and replace what you use. Consider carbohydrate dose, timing & type. 

3. High level endurance athletes in certain training blocks may benefit from some training in low glucose availability. Carbohydrate availability is needed in most instances. 

4. Carbohydrate dose meets demands as a linear relationship, with an overarching cap based on situational Calorie ceilings. Most folks do fine w 1-4g/kg, some athletes may need 12+g/kg.

5. Failing to meet energy requirements can lead to health and performance decrements (LEA & RED-S). The use of ‘junky’ foods makes meeting higher carbohydrate requirement feasible.

6. Carbohydrates in the hours before training are often a very worthwhile thing. Their benefit differs depending on the situation, but they’re not worth stressing over in most instances.

7. Caffeine is effective, use the ergogenic dose (3-6mg/kg when appropriate). This is a high intake so consider the tolerability of the ingestion methods (pills, coffee, energy drinks etc)

8. If exercise is less than <60 minutes during exercise carbohydrates are not needed. 30g/hr appropriate for 60-120 minutes, 60g/hr 120-180 minutes and 90g/hr if exercising for >2.5 hours.

9. Consider carbohydrate to fluid ratio in ‘during exercise’ carbohydrate drinks. Concentrations beyond 6-8% may cause gastrointestinal stress, malabsorption, & dehydration.

10. Gastrointestinal capacity is impaired during exercise. Consider the tolerability of foods you ingest in and prior to exercise. Consider rates of gastric emptying & intestinal absorption.

11. Carbohydrate type relate to rates of absorption, & GI & are mostly dictated by how quickly fuel availability & replenishment is required.

12. Pre exercise nutrition starts when the last exercise bout ended. Consider dose, and time frames when deciding on timing, and type of carbohydrate ingestion after exercise.


FNC_Staff_1.jpg



Mackenzie Baker

FNC Coach and Sports Nutritionist


To learn more about sports nutrition or fuelling for exercise, contact us today to work with a sports nutritionist who can help you maximise your training and performance.

References:

[1] A. Jeukendrup & M Gleeson, "Sport Nutrition," Third Edition pg 235-237

[2] Martin D. Hoffman, Trent Stellingwerff & Ricardo J.S. Costa (2018):

Considerations for ultra-endurance activities: part 2 – hydration, Research in Sports Medicine

[3]  Goulet ED (2012): Dehydration and endurance performance in competitive athletes.

[4] Ricardo J.S. Costa, Martin D. Hoffman & Trent Stellingwerff (2018):

Considerations for ultra-endurance activities: part 1- nutrition, Research in Sports Medicine,

[5]  A. Jeukendrup & M Gleeson, "Sport Nutrition," Third Edition pg 241


[6] International society of sports nutrition position stand: caffeine and performance. Journal of the International Society of Sports Nutrition  7, Article number: 5 (2010)

[7] J. A. Romijn, E. F. Coyle, L. S. Sidossis, X. J. Zhang, and R. R. Wolfe (1995) Relationship between fatty acid delivery and fatty acid oxidation during strenuous exercise

[8] National Health and Medical Research Council (2013) Australian Dietary Guidelines. Canberra: National Health and Medical Research Council.

[9] Hargreaves M1, Hawley JA, Jeukendrup A.(2004) Pre-exercise carbohydrate and fat ingestion: effects on metabolism and performance.

[10] Murray B, Rosenbloom CA, (2018) Fundamentals of glycogen metabolism for coaches and athletes

[11] Louise M. Burke, John A. Hawley, Stephen H. S. Wong & Asker E. Jeukendrup (2011): Carbohydrates for training and competition, Journal of Sports Sciences,

[12]  Mountjoy M, Sundgot-Borgen JK, Burke LM, et al. Br J Sports Med 2018;52:687–697.

[13] Greenhaff PL1, Karagounis LG, Peirce N, Simpson EJ, Hazell M, Layfield R, Wackerhage H, Smith K, Atherton P, Selby A, Rennie MJ. (2008) Disassociation between the effects of amino acids and insulin on signaling, ubiquitin ligases, and protein turnover in human muscle.

[14] Ivy JL, Kuo CH, (1998) Regulation of GLUT4 protein and glycogen synthase during muscle glycogen synthesis after exercise.

[15] D. S. Battram, J. Shearer, D. Robinson and T. E. Graham, (2003) Caffeine ingestion does not impede the resynthesis of proglycogen and macroglycogen followingprolonged exercise and carbohydrate supplementation in humans

[16] Ivy JL1, Katz AL, Cutler CL, Sherman WM, Coyle EF.(1998) Muscle glycogen synthesis after exercise: Effect of time of carbohydrate ingestion.

[17] Hawley, J. A., Bosch, A. N., Weltan, S. M., Dennis, S. C., & Noakes, T. D. (1994). Glucose kinetics during prolonged exercise in euglycemic and hyperglycaemic subjects.

[18] Prado de Oliveira, Burini, Jeukendrup 2014. Gastrointestinal Complaints During Exercise: Prevalence, Etiology, and Nutritional Recommendations

[19] Steege, R. W., & Kolkman, J. J. (2012). The pathophysiology and management of gastrointestinal symptoms during physical exercise, and the role of splanchnic blood flow. 

Top tips to enjoy social events and occasions

Reading Time

In the real world of fat loss dieting and healthful eating endeavors people are faced with instances (often social) where accurate tracking isn't viable nor should it be insisted upon, and/or they have limited control over their intake of food.

CALORIFIC EVENT STAYING ON TRACK [FNC COLOURS]-02.jpg

These are the instances where eating routine, habits, and schedule are out of whack whether it be for a party, event, holiday, wedding, etc. Rather than thinking these important contributors to total health need to be avoided, approaching and executing them well is the solution.

So here are my top 9 tips to avoid 'going backward' with your fat loss, or weight maintenance goals whilst still getting the most out of the occasion.


1. PLAN AHEAD, EAT A LITTLE LESS CARBS AND FATS THE DAY OF - on the day of an event/occasion involving food or Calories, reducing your intake of carbs and/or fats in the prior meals is not a bad idea to free up some extra room for the occurrence of higher Calorie intakes.

2. NAIL PROTEIN & PLANTS FIRST & FOREMOST. - consider the food order of importance, nail the things of most importance and the greatest positive influence on the suppression of the drive to eat. Ensure sufficiency of protein and plants before you reach for carb, fat dense foods.

3. FILL UP ON FIBRE - closely tying into point 2 but with the addition of wholegrains alongside fruit and vegetable matter. When in doubt just fill up on higher fiber plant matter. Even if you eat a lot of food, if 'food' means plant matter, you'll unlikely end up eating a lot of Calories.

4. FILL UP ON WATER & DIET DRINKS - Fill the stomach, stretch it out, drive down the urge to consume excessive amounts of food thereafter. Drink something prior to ordering, eating and/or if food is everywhere grab water or a diet soda.

5. DON'T USE LIQUIDS FOR CALORIES- Liquids do help fill you up, but in comparison to solid foods their effect on fullness is limited. So if you're going to consume Calories aim to make it from solids. If it's about alcoholic beverages, go for the lower Calorie options like vodka soda, or vodka diet coke.

6. SLOW DOWN YOUR THINKING AROUND FOOD. - slow down your thought process, ask logical questions, give yourself time, and think before you mindlessly grab food and shove it in your gob. If the food or more of it won't make your time better, and you don't really want to, then why eat it, if you need something in your hand, to eat, grab a diet coke.

7. SLOW DOWN YOUR EATING - Chew your food, eat slowly, encourage slower eating via smaller or less efficient utensils, have a chat during the meal all in a bed to let your hunger satisfaction catch up before you reach for more.

8. ALCOHOL = MINIMUM ENJOYABLE DOSE MINDSET WITH NO NEED TO TRACK IT. - There is a point where more drinks, won't yield much of a return on the enjoyment of the occasion, this is the point where you become that 'drunk idiot'. Estimate that point and understand going beyond it probably isn't worth it. IMO tracking alcohol and trading off carbs and/or fats to fit in drinks is overkill for most people. Simply freeing some additional Calories by consuming slightly fewer carbs and fats in the meals prior and exercising a logical moderation, or 'minimum enjoyable dose' limit of standard drinks works just fine without creating distractions from social occasions.

9. LOOK TO SAVE CALORIES WITHOUT EATING LESS FOOD - Consider the presence of lower fiber, Calorie-dense fat and/or carb-dense food, ingredients, cooking oils, dressings, sauces, and condiments. Reduce, moderate or even eliminate where possible. A low-fat approach is probably the easiest way to make this happen. Then refer to point number 2 and 3.

At FNC we understand social occasions involving Calories are part of a totally healthy human. Ask us for more practical ways you work towards your goals with your social and total health in mind.

TO FIND OUT MORE ABOUT NUTRITION COACHING CLICK THE BUTTON BELOW

Managing urges, impulses and unplanned eating

Reading Time

This blog is not intended to replace medical and psychological support and guidance. If you believe you may have any risk factors for an eating disorder, please speak to a medical professional.

Why do we overeat in situations even when we don’t want to? We often discuss the benefits and importance of controlling your environment (you can’t eat what isn’t there), however sometimes it goes beyond that and it isn’t just as simple as setting up an environment that is conducive to your goals, especially when we think of work, family and social settings.


Firstly, let’s define a few terms.

Urge: a strong desire

Impulse: a sudden strong and unreflective urge or desire to act (in this instance to eat)

Binge: loss of control episode of eating, unplanned 

*these are all generally opposite to a goal behaviour

A few studies have been done on the mindset of dieting. 

These results confirm that merely planning to go on a diet can trigger overeating in restrained eaters, reflecting the dynamic connection between dieting and overeating. (Eat, drink, and be merry, for tomorrow we diet: Effects of anticipated deprivation on food intake in restrained and unrestrained eaters: D Urbszat - ‎2002)

The last supper effect : merely thinking you’re on a diet can trigger overeating. It can promote a good vs bad foods, all or nothing, on/off diet mentality. 


The brain doesn’t seem to hear “don’t, no, can’t.” So when you say no pizza, no chocolate, no biscuits, no ice cream, the brain just hears pizza, chocolate, biscuits, ice cream. This strategy is also used for athletes in skill development by instructing them what to do, not what to do.

In nutrition, saying eat more protein, eat more plants instead of don’t eat this, don’t eat that.

Some people may be bored of their diets and seek highly palatable foods. A strategy for this is to improve the taste, texture and variety of your meals within your energy needs that are aligned with your goals. So looking to flavour your food with low calories sauces, herbs, spices and seasoning.


Emotions are complex processes. Our emotions also need to be nourished and can drive unplanned eating. When our emotions become stimulated by something the whole body gets in on the action. It is an idea to learn to gain a sense of knowledge over your emotional states and the physical sensations/urges your experience as a result of your emotions.

But when it comes to nutrition and food choices reflect on the following:

  • Is food a form of comfort? Excitement? Only source of enjoyment? 

  • Is it a form of safety? A way to distract from emotions?

  • Is it a form of rebellion or self sabotage?

What we can do is collaboratively work together (client and coach) to find out why this is happening. If not with a coach, then play detective on your own.


Now some people use food as a reward to self medicate as a result of stress, emotion, anxiety, depression, etc. This is to achieve a sense of control and also by choosing highly rewarding foods that signal a dopamine, pleasure response.

The eating episodes are driven by vulnerabilities such as:

  • Thoughts: “I deserve a treat”

  • Emotions (sad/anxious/angry)

  • Physical (hunger/tired) 

There are 5 Stages of Impulse control:

  • Urge 

  • Tension

  • Acting

  • Relief

  • Guilt / Consequences


The urge and the tension is a bit of a chicken and egg situation, it is unsure which comes first and it may also be dependent on the situation/individual.

Example:

  • Tension Build Up

  • Followed by a thought: “I can’t stand it”

  • Followed by physical urge to eat

  • Followed by thought: “I must do something” to relieve tension/urge

  • Followed by the behaviour of eating 

  • Followed by relief

  • Followed by thought: “Why did I do that?” as a result of guilt/consequence. 


If you experience bouts of emotional eating you can learn to describe your experience.

  • Where do you feel it? Are there physical symptoms?

  • List your emotions/feelings/mood

  • How bad are the urges/cravings on a scale of 1-10?

  • How long do they last?

  • What happens afterwards?

  • Is it a true impulse or has it been influenced your environment?


A lot of our unplanned eating episodes are affected by our vulnerabilities.

  • Hunger

  • Anger, negative emotions, low mood

  • Self sabotage

  • Loneliness, boredom, procrastination

  • Tiredness, feeling overwhelmed

  • Peers, environment

  • Access to highly rewarding foods, high risk situations such as functions, work/office/buffets

  • Peer pressure

Our vulnerabilities tend to be our antecedents: a thing that existed before the behaviour of unplanned eating, which is then followed by a consequence.


A way we can learn to overcome these bouts of unplanned eating is to do a CHAIN ANALYSIS.

The term chain is used, because you can break the chain at a number of points and prevents the following sequence of events..

The CHAIN ANALYSIS looks at:

  • Vulnerability (hunger/tired/low mood)

  • Prompting event (access to food)

  • Links to thoughts (deserve the treat)

  • Problem behaviour (over eating)

  • Consequence

Attached is an example of a CHAIN ANALYSIS you can complete next time you experience an unplanned eating episode.

VULNERABILITY + ENVIRONMENT = HIGH RISK OF PROBLEM BEHAVIOUR


Remember, beating yourself up won’t help the situation.

Look over the chain analysis, the events leading up to the episode and see where it can be broken. Can you reduce/avoid the high risk situation? Can you work to reduce vulnerabilities such as hunger, mood, fatigue? 


Just as before where we mentioned the brain doesn’t hear no’s/don’t/can’t, suppressing feelings doesn’t help either. Trying to suppress a thought/feeling increases it. 

If I ask you to think about a shark, you might be able to.

But if I ask you not to think about a shark, you’ll only think about sharks. 


Strategies to put into practice:

*Key word PRACTICE. They won’t work first time every time. 

Retrain the brain

Practice doing something different is the same circumstance. Create new habits, patterns, pathways, memories.

Practice new behaviours in a challenging but not high risk situation to build the skill. 

Practice portion control when you’re strong/confident not when tired/vulnerable.


Urge Surfing

  • Ride out the cravings until they go away

  • Remember urges pass by themselves, we normally give in before the urge passes which reinforces the craving/behaviour

  • Just like ocean waves urges start small, grow in size then break up and dissipate

  • Practice mindfulness regularly and sit with it

  • Watch your breath, notice your thoughts, describe your thoughts and feelings

  • PRACTICE THIS DAILY or when the craving/urge regularly occurs


In summary, identify and list the steps that lead up to the episodes of unplanned eating. 

  • Where in the order of events can you break the chain? 

  • What strategies can you put in place to avoid/reduce the risk of the situation? 

  • Can you create a new set of behaviours to positively deal with emotions/thoughts? 

  • Can you ride out urges/cravings?

If you feel you need further assistance identifying/controlling/dealing with your thoughts/emotions/feelings, this is beyond our scope so please don’t be afraid to talk to your GP to get referred to a qualified practitioner. 


To learn more about controlling your environment or food choices that are aligned with your goals, contact us today

Realities of Muscle Gain

Reading Time

Hypertrophy is muscle growth. Resistance training performance is the most critical aspect to muscle growth and nutrition supports this as much as possible. Don’t get confused with this order of importance. 

FNC guide for muscle gain:

  1. Find a coach / good PT to write you a hypertrophy focussed gym program and make sure you know how to do all movements correctly. 

  2. Spend at least 2 weeks finding your maintenance Calorie number.

  3. Set your Calorie target based on your goal and level of training experience.

  4. Set a daily protein target.

  5. Work out how many meals you can spread that protein target across, factoring in what is actually feasible for you do to consistently around your lifestyle. (Ryan’s favourite is the 4x4 formula. 4 meals per day, with about 4 hours in between each).

  6. Have a rough (but flexible) guide for fat and carb targets.

  7. Be consistent, be patient. 

ryan+muscle.jpg

Hypertrophy Training

  • It’s all about training the muscles you want to grow and focusing on progressive overload, training the muscles frequently enough and close enough to failure. Over time, adding reps and/or sets and/or weight to your program as your muscles adapt to training. Your program will also need to be individualised to your level of training experience, as more advanced lifters will likely need more training volume to continue to build muscle 

Rates of muscle gain

  • The rate in which you could expect to gain muscle is largely dependent on your level of experience with resistance training, and genetics. Gains are usually faster in beginners compared to those who’ve been weight training for years. 

    • Beginner 1-2% body weight gain per month

    • Experienced 0.5-1% body weight gain per month

  • You might actually fit somewhere in the middle as well, these are just estimates to give some level of expectation.

  • So at 75kg, one could expect to gain between 375 grams and 1.1 kg per month depending on their weight training experience.  

  • If you are gaining weight much faster than this, it’s likely that a lot of the weight will be fat mass, not muscle. 

  • So don’t expect early gains to continue for a long time. You’re ability to build muscle will slow over time. The amount you can gain before this happens is likely to be very individual.  

  • If you have previously gained muscle from a resistance training program, but have lost some of that muscle due to de-training (taking a massive break) you will likely re-gain muscle to the point where you stopped training reasonably quickly, similar to a beginner lifter.

  • Rates of muscle growth are also highly individualised. A 12 week muscle gain study showed huge differences in muscle gain rates in participants, despite them completing the same program.

Interference - Cardio Training

  • Participating in other forms of training, such as cardio or HIIT could interfere with your strength and muscle gains. It doesn’t mean you can combine different types of training and still build some muscle, it can just slow down the rate of muscle gain. If your ‘other’ training also means that when it comes time for your hypertrophy session you are sore, fatigued or have depleted your glycogen (stored carbohydrates) you are unlikely to train as well as if you prioritised the hypertrophy training alone. Remembering that resistance training is above nutrition in terms of importance for muscle gain, this is a significant consideration. 

  • If you are going to do other training, alongside your hypertrophy training, you want to make sure the volume and impact is low enough so that you feel your best during each hypertrophy session, with adequate rest, energy and without soreness from cardio, Crossfit or other sports.

Calorie Surplus

  • Building muscle is an energy expensive process, so if your main aim is to build as much muscle as possible, averaging a small Calorie surplus is best. Ideally, you would first have a good idea of your maintenance Calories and then aim for a surplus relative to your weight training experience.  

  • Muscle itself is more metabolically expensive than fat, meaning we burn a few more Calories from muscle mass compared to fat mass.    

  • The surplus need not be large though. Body fat gain is a reality of consuming a Calorie surplus over time, however, a study was published in 2010 showing that a small surplus built the same amount of muscle over 12 weeks, with ⅕ of the body fat gain of a larger 500-600 Calorie surplus. 

  • An advanced lifter might only consume a very slight surplus of 100 Calories average per day. A beginner might go for something closer to a 10-15% surplus above maintenance. This is because, as mentioned, beginners are likely to build muscle at a faster rate, and with muscle being more ‘metabolically expensive’, a larger surplus is likely to be more useful without a huge amount of fat gain. These figures are absolutely just ballpark guidelines and the dynamic nature of metabolism will need to be accounted for over time. Checking progress over time and making adjustments to Caloric intake will be required to optimise hypertrophy.

Re-composition (re-comp)

  • Re-comp basically refers to reducing body fat while increasing muscle mass. It is absolutely possible, just likely to be slower than going through some dedicated cycles of focussing on increasing muscle, then reducing the body fat gains that come along with it. 

  • However, if your goal is to re-comp, it might be a legitimate thing for you to consume a slight Calorie deficit whilst maintaining resistance training. In a study of elderly men who participated in a resistance training program with protein supplementation, one group consumed a very slight deficit and over 16 weeks lost about 2.4 kg of fat mass whilst increasing about 1.7 kg of muscle. Over 4 months, for beginner lifters, this amount of muscle gain is not fast, however if your goal is re-comp, it’s great to know that it is possible.

Nutrition and macros

  • When aiming for re-comp or maximising muscle gain, less protein is needed compared to protecting against muscle loss during a diet (that’s a whole other topic for another day). Something in the range of about 1.6-2.2 grams / KG of body weight / day is a good aim. 

  • Fats and carbs then come down to a bit of personal preference, however aiming for about 20-30% of Calories from fats and the remainder all going to carbs is a pretty good guideline. Favouring fats too heavily will reduce the amount of Caloric budget available for carbohydrates which can negatively impact strength training performance.

  • Remembering that training is actually the number 1 priority for muscle growth, it makes sense to ensure that carbs are as high as possible within that personal preference. We break carbs down to glucose and glucose is the body’s preferred fuel source for intense resistance training.  

Nutrition timing

  • Once total daily protein is taken care of, the next consideration is to split that protein intake across about 3-6 meals during the day. More than this is totally fine, less than this is probably not ideal for maximising muscle growth. 

  • Those protein intakes would ideally each contain 20-40 grams of protein and be spaced about 3-4 hours apart. 

  • If choosing plant based protein sources, the portion may have to be a little higher, around 1.5x more. 

  • For hypertrophy training, the timing of carbohydrates is unlikely to be a huge consideration apart from, once again, personal preference. Unless training the same muscle group more than once within 24 hours, stored carbohydrates in the muscle (glycogen) should be sufficient again no matter the timing of carbohydrate consumption each day. 

  • However, looking at optimisation and best case, it makes sense to have carbohydrates before training just to ensure all glycogen levels are “topped up”. 

  • Again, with training being the most important factor, consider if you feel and train better with carbohydrates in the meal before training. 

To learn more about muscle building, check out some of our other blogs:

Making nutrition easy and automatic is a big part of muscle gain. It’s a goal which takes time and consistency and having a coach there to keep you on track, look at your results objectively and help guide you towards the easiest path can really help.

The passata plant sauce hack

Reading Time

Increasing your intake of plants is one of the easiest, biggest bang for buck, lowest barrier to entry methods to control your Calorie intake, create a Calorie deficit and achieve weight loss. So if fat loss is the name of the game increasing your intake of plants is almost certainly a good idea.

At FNC we often encourage our clients to increase there intake by providing daily targets which can be difficult to meet at first.

Often the issue is not that 'it's just too much', it's actually not being aware of the ways you can make plant consumption a far easier and more enjoyable daily habit. The key is to look at the 'how' part of eating plants.

Integrated plants into meals in different, potentially novelty ways, enhancing taste and softening the texture and consistency are all examples of how you can turn eating plants from a chore to something you look forward to.

For the sake of your attention, one of the best plant 'hacks' is to make vegetable sauces using a base of passata and any vegetables you can get your hands on.

All you need is a bottle of passata (pureed tomatoes in a bottle), a blender and a bunch of whatever cooked vegetables you can get your hands on. As mentioned the vegetables need to be cooked, and for best results cooked well so they're nice and soft. It doesn't really matter what that cooking method is even if they're roasted vegetable dinner leftovers from the night before.

What you're going to want to do is toss all the vegetables into a blender with the desired amount of passata, and any herbs and spices you feel like including.

Blend it up and you have yourself a large portion of your daily veg intake disguised as a soft, and tasty soupy-like sauce that can be added to any of your meals as you please. Use it as a pasta sauce, perhaps add it to stir-frys. It's not only going to enhance the taste of your food but it'll add a decent amount of plants to your daily targets without it being hard or a chore.

To learn more simple and effective ways to improve your nutrition to help you move towards your goals, contact us today for more individual guidance.

Protein Bar Review

Reading Time

I love protein bars. Yes they don't taste as good as a real cookie, or chocolate bar. But knowing they're providing protein towards my daily totals and somewhat lower in Calories compared to something really 'naughty' just makes them taste that much sweeter to the point I am willing to admit I sometimes enjoy them to the level of a legitimate cookie.

In combination with that, protein bars can be a great snack than can almost serve as a meal replacement which is perfectly fine provided the overall healthfulness of the diet is good, whole foods are high, and fruit and vegetable requirements are met. They're a useful tool for buys people as an alternative to reaching for the office kitchen cookie tin.

I'd consider myself a 'protein bar connoisseur'. I've been buying and trying protein bars for a while now and have even had streaks of 'must try all the flavours'. I don't think there would be many protein bars on this planet I haven't tried. So I think I'm a pretty good person to make a few recommendations.

So over time, I've developed a bit of a top 'hit-list'. Here it is.

But before I dive in, IMO the factors that make a protein bar great are as follows.

  1. Calories per bite

  2. Protein content

  3. Taste & texture

  4. Digestive comfort

  5. Quality of ingredients


Typically protein bars lie on a spectrum of 'full of low quality protein and ingredients that will likely upset your guts', through to 'fake health hipster bars' (the 'raw-natural' kind) that are no better than the 'unhealthier' ones despite the fact they're marketed as being 'natural', and free from 'bad things'.

So here is my pick of the bunch

ALL-TIME NUMBER 1: Smart Protein Bars
Uncooked and free from sugar alcohols making them easy on the guts. The protein quality and content is great and the Calories per 60g bar are the lowest I've seen. The fact they're hard to find and have a questionable texture isn't enough to rid them of my number one spot. They're also not the best tasting bars, but it's a small trade-off and I think they still taste pretty damn good. Unless it’s the coconut flavor, certainly avoid that one.

Number 2: MRE bars.
Probably my favourite tasting bar with fantastic ingredients that are easy on the guts. Only second to the SPB because they're slightly higher in Calories which would be okay if protein content was the same, but unfortunately, they match the SPB at 20g protein meaning the additions in Calories are coming from carbs and fats. Not really a bad thing, but a lower Calorie bar means you can eat more other stuff later on.

Number 3: ONE bars
Up there in taste, not too bad on the Calories but can and do cause some gastric distress. Also, get a point off as they're not available in Australia as far as I understand. If they were they'd be a fair few points in front of Quest bars.

Number 4: Quest bars
Probably the brand that defines the protein bar, they're common, easily obtained, taste pretty good, are decently low in Calories and provide the upper industry-standard of 20g protein. However they can be a little rough on the guts, so proceed with caution. They're very close IMO to the ONE bars but are slightly edged out due to taste. The best part about Quest bars is that they're available almost everywhere!

PROTEIN BAR TOP 4-02.jpg


Chobani vs Coyo

Reading Time

Now I love the idea of a vegan or at least a vegetarian diet. My own diet is far off being vegetarian these days and I really enjoy vegan food (especially in Bali). But what I don't love about 'veganism' is some of the dumb shit that, lesser-educated, potentially bias vegans say.

Whenever I see dairy yogurt getting slammed because of it's 'bad saturated fat content' only for Coyo to be proposed as a healthier alternative I really scratch my head.

Coyo vs Chobani (FNC version)-02.jpg

Like hello guys, the Coyo you push as a 'healthy' alternative, is not only worse off in terms of Calorie density and protein content. But it's basically all saturated fat.


It's worth noting that saturated fat is not bad in small to moderate amounts. But too much is almost certainly not a good idea and unsaturated fats should almost certainly make up the majority of our total fat intake. But that aside... The balance of robust evidence shows dairy is not only fine for health, but it's also actually been associated with better long term health. [4,5,6,7] and most importantly dairy might help you get a bit more jacked, and maybe a bit leaner. [1,2,3]
So considering the above, unless you avoid dairy yogurt for ethical or preference reasons, Coyo is far from a 'better' or 'best' alternative.


To become more aware of current nutritional diets, fads and trends whilst understanding the principals required to help you achieve your goals, contact us today.


[1] Tang et al; (2009),

[2] Hartman et al; (2007),

[3] Abargouei et al; (2012),

[4] Kratz et al; (2013),

[5] Elwood et al; (2004),

[6] Mahshid et al; (2018) [

7] Lago-Sampedro et al; (2019)

Intermittent Fasting

Reading Time

Intermittent fasting seems to be gaining in popularity and some people have been getting great results with it. There are a number of different strategies, such as; eating regularly for 5 days of the week and eating next to nothing for 2 days, or fasting for 16 to 20 hours of each day and only eating in a short window of time.

There are no magic tricks though, some people just find it easier to eat less in a day (or overall in a week) when they have set times when they can and can’t eat. The most important thing in terms of our weight is how much we are eating and drinking each day, not the actual times we are eating. The underlying principle of body weight management is energy balance. The amount of energy we consume in a day versus the amount of energy we burn in a day. It is totally fine to look at energy balance with a weekly average too. Calories are the unit of measurement for energy. Weight loss requires a Calorie deficit (consuming less energy than we burn) and weight gain a Calorie surplus (consuming more energy than we burn). 

Intermittent fasting, whether we are talking about fasting for certain days of the week or certain periods of each day, can be beneficial for many people aiming to create and sustain a Calorie deficit for weight loss. However, reviews of numerous research studies conclude that whilst fasting is a viable strategy for weight loss, it is not superior to creating Calorie deficit through other means, such as monitoring Calorie intake but eating throughout each day. 

Having rules around when one can and can’t eat might help people eat a little less each day, especially if they are prone to snacking/grazing. It means the window in which they allow themselves to snack is much shorter. It can also help to show people that dealing with a bit of hunger is possible and we don’t need to be eating at all points of the day.

However if you eat the same amount of food between 12pm and 7pm as you would between say 8am and 7pm it will not make any difference to your body weight.

Fasted cardio is another linked strategy which is believed to be a winning combination for weight loss. Not eating anything before doing some form of exercise in an aim to burn more body fat. Again, through scientific research, we see that fasted cardio is not superior to simply managing the amount of energy being consumed and burned each day. When study groups consumed the same amount of Calories, it made no difference to fat loss whether the first meal was before or after exercise. 

There are also conflicting ideas about when is the best time to eat when using a fasting strategy. There is research showing greater weight loss when most food intake is in the morning. However there is equally as much research showing greater weight loss when food intake is skewed towards the evening. The greatest influence on the results appears to be personal preference and to what an individual can adhere. Tuning into your appetite can help you develop the best strategy that works for you. If you are not often hungry in the morning, but feel ravenous in the evenings, it would likely suit you to eat most of your food in the evening. And if you are hungrier in the mornings than evenings, the same applies in reverse. 

There are some loud voices in the nutrition world encouraging everyone to practice fasting due to improvements in autophagy (turnover of cells), inflammation and other markers of health. However research has shown that weight loss by any means improves these markers and the maintenance of a healthy body weight is just as influential. Again, finding the best strategy for you personally, to reduce and maintain a healthy body weight long term is the key. 

With any nutritional strategy, we believe it’s important to consider whether it is a sustainable long term approach. Do you see yourself continuing with his strategy for years, even lifelong? If the answer is no, then it might not be the best strategy for you. 

You can practice intermittent fasting without having hard rules about the times you can and can’t eat. If you are not hungry in the morning, you don’t have to eat. Some days you might be hungry and choose to eat earlier than other days. Some days it might suit you and your body more to eat in the morning, especially if exercise performance is a consideration. If you can listen to your appetite and eat accordingly, this may mean that you actually fast some days whilst other days not. 

For muscle building specifically, intermittent fasting is likely to be sub-optimal. To optimise muscle growth, we ideally want to spread protein intake throughout the day. By restricting times in which we are consuming a protein rich meal, we may not be optimising our muscle growth potential. Current recommendations from the Journal of the International Society of Sports Nutrition (JISSN) are to spread protein intake across at least 4 meals to maximise muscle growth potential. To do so whilst restricting the times in which we eat through fasting is unlikely to produce optimal results. 

In conclusion, consider your goal, your preferences and how you like to eat. Fasting absolutely may suit you personally and even if not completely optimal for your goal, might still work in your favour if it helps you maintain a consistent eating schedule and consume the appropriate amount of energy for your goal. 


Not sure if you can do it forever but are interested? By all means try it. We just suggest that you don’t give yourself rules which are too strict and encourage you to try fasting in conjunction with listening to your appetite and developing a way of eating which you enjoy. 

If you’ve tried fasting but it didn’t work for you, don’t feel like you failed. It was the strategy that failed you and there are plenty of other viable fat loss strategies.



If you would like to learn more about nutrition and how you can find a way of eating that suits you, contact today.


F.N.C COACH MACKENZIE'S NON-TRACKING MINI CUT RESULT

Reading Time

WHAT HE DID & HIS RETROSPECTIVE OBSERVATIONS.

After 9-ish months of ‘maintenance eating, various trips including an NYC/LA food tour. I wanted to get a little leaner before Bali which is now 3 days away. I told myself I’d stop when it got too difficult, or I reached 74kg. This morning I was 74.0 and things were getting a little hard so the ‘diet’ ends today. This is the 4th time I’ve done a mini cut but the first without any Calorie tracking. This result took place over a 35-day non-tracking fat loss period with zero Calorie or macro tracking. In total, about 3.5 kilograms was lost via what was honestly very sub-par adherence levels.



WHAT I DID

-Chose more filling, low-Calorie-per-bite wholefood options and ate almost exclusively in that way.

-Ate to conservative hunger satisfaction. Slowing things down helped.

-Aimed to be aware of internal hunger cues. Drank zero/low-Calorie liquids if unsure.

-Implemented a few strategies to drive hunger and food focus down.

-Encouraged activity by choosing to walk more when the option was available.

-Ensured I ate a decent dose of a protein-dense food 3-4 times a day.

-Kept lifting weight like normal.

-Swapped one of my meals with a protein bar.

-Weighed portions of when I remembered / could be bothered.

-Did 2-3 day refeeds by simply eating more carbs from mostly the same foods when I felt things got hard enough and/or my mannerism became slightly zombie-like. (Did this mostly to self-experiment I will discuss this further below)


OBSERVATIONS & THOUGHTS

-It was easy. But an informed understanding of food and dieting is required for this approach to work.

-Pre diet perceptions of ‘enough food to feel normal’ become false once you are a few days in.

-I honestly wasn’t actually that compliant. Not having any numbers or tracking made staying adherent harder and created many non-adherence opportunities where I did slip up.

-It’s a far less invasive, more convenient way to diet and achieve fat loss.

-Using food selection and all of the above to control energy balance is absolutely effective.

-My daily scale weight fluctuations were vast compared to past diets I’ve done. Not sure if the fact this diet had zero tracking was at play. Trusting the process and objectively looking at trends over time helped me stay sane.



THOUGHTS ON THE REFEED SELF-EXPERIMENT THING.

I’m not a fan of short refeeds, or any form of Calorie cycling, high-low days etc and this little text further cements that stance. I prefer consistent energy intakes over a week. But in the name of ‘testing’, I thought I’d play with doing a multi-day refeed whenever... 

1. I felt cravings and hunger start to notably affect me.

2. I felt like my spontaneous activity levels dropped from diet-induced lethargy.

I ended up doing my first 2-3 day refeed at day 21, then once a week thereafter. Totalling 3 refeed instances over 35 days.

-I did notice cravings drop the during and one day after the refeed.

-I noticed a feeling of more energy during and one day after.

-But these positive effects only lasted 24 hours at most after the refeed was over.

-I felt doing the refeeds created a negative headspace despite my best logic.

-I didn’t think the short 2-3 day refeeds were worthwhile. I don’t believe any physiological benefits occur unless it’s for more than say a week. But I do think they may offer some psychological/mental benefits in certain people.

My stance on short refeeds remains the same. I still prefer to keep on dieting, therefore reaching the goal sooner, so the diet is shorter and maintenance eating can resume sooner. With that strategy maybe I would have finished at 25 days instead of 35.

All in all this was a great little experiment. It’s truly liberating to know I can not only maintain weight but also achieve great fat loss without any Calorie tracking business especially because I’ve had a history of disordered eating behaviors.


mac mini cut.jpg

Sign up for the next intake of the FNC Macabolic Mini Cut starting August 11th


Myth: Artificial Sweeteners are Worse than Sugar

Reading Time

But what about the artificial sweeteners? What about the chemicals? 

There are many calorie free or low calorie sweeteners on the market now as a way of replacing sugar or calorie dense sweet ingredients.


Common examples are:

  • Aspartame 

  • Saccharin

  • Acesulfame-K

  • Sucralose

There are also sugar-free sweeteners or sugar alcohols known as polyols that  occur naturally in plants but can also be produced commercially. 

These include sorbitol, xylitol and more.


Their main purpose is to reduce the calorie content of beverages and other sweet treats to help control energy intake and assist in weight loss.

They are 200-13,000 times sweeter than sugar so minimal amounts are needed to create that sweet taste and potentially satisfy a craving or desire whilst also helping reduce caloric intake.


There also seems to be a myth circulating that they are worse than sugar itself.

Studies have been done to refute this idea in both weight loss and health aspects.


So what do the studies say about artificial sweeteners? 

  • Replacing caloric sweetened beverages with low calorie sweetener alternatives reduced BMI, Fat Mass and Waist Circumference

  • There was no consistent evidence that intense sweeteners cause insulin release or lower blood sugar in healthy individuals

  • For weight loss, replacing caloric foods/drinks with low calorie sweetener alternatives works. No strong evidence for the effects of sweeteners on health

  • Using foods and drinks sweetened with aspartame instead of those sweetened with sucrose is an effective way to maintain and lose weight without reducing the palatability of the diet.

It can be a way to implement a small change in an individual's diet that has a significant impact.

Example. Replacing 2 cans of full sugar coke 362 calories) to 2 cans of coke zero drops their calories by 360 calorie, helping with their energy intake and helping them move towards a calorie deficit needed for weight loss.


Adding sugar free cordial may also be an extremely low calorie strategy to encourage and increase water consumption whilst also satisfying a craving for a sugar sweetened beverage.


Safe limits of diet soft drink consumption are up towards 15 cans per day. 

*An issue to note may be on the sugar alcohols effects on an individual perhaps causing gastric distress but that is not common across all consumption. 

So next time you craving a sweet carbonated beverage or feel like adding some artificial sweetener to your coffee, don’t be scared. At the moment there is no research to suggest it is worse for your health or body composition than sugar or full sugar beverages.

If you would like to learn more about nutrition and debunk some common myths in the process, reach out to us today.